Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KCEIX vs NLSIX
KCEIX vs NLSIX Comparison
Open Charts KCEIX vs NLSIX
Knights of Columbus Long/Short Eq I
Price$12.56
Change+$0.06 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets184.21M
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$20.25
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.1B
KCEIX vs NLSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCEIX vs. NLSIX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCEIX is a Buy and NLSIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 8.1B vs. KCEIX (184M). KCEIX pays higher dividends than NLSIX: KCEIX (1.82) vs NLSIX (0.02). KCEIX was incepted earlier than NLSIX: KCEIX (6 years) vs NLSIX (14 years). KCEIX (1.89) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). KCEIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. NLSIX (48.00). KCEIX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSIX: KCEIX (25000) vs NLSIX (1000000). NLSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.31 vs. KCEIX (6.87). KCEIX return over 5 years is better than : 51.49 vs. NLSIX (23.72).
| KCEIX | NLSIX | KCEIX / NLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 1.32 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 1.32 | 143% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.656 | 8.000 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 25000 | 1000000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 184M | 8.1B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.82 | 0.02 | 8,962% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.87 | 8.31 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.08 | 23.64 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.49 | 23.72 | 217% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 65.72 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement