Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KCEIX vs NLSCX
KCEIX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts KCEIX vs NLSCX
Knights of Columbus Long/Short Eq I
Price$12.45
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets191.59M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.85
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.02B
KCEIX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCEIX vs. NLSCX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCEIX is a Buy and NLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 8.03B vs. KCEIX (192M). KCEIX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: KCEIX (1.78) vs NLSCX (0.00). KCEIX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: KCEIX (6 years) vs NLSCX (14 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than KCEIX (1.89). KCEIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. NLSCX (48.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than KCEIX: NLSCX (1000) vs KCEIX (25000). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.13 vs. KCEIX (5.14). KCEIX return over 5 years is better than : 50.85 vs. NLSCX (15.78).
| KCEIX | NLSCX | KCEIX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 2.43 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 2.43 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.731 | 6.614 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 25000 | 1000 | 2,500% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 192M | 8.03B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.78 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.14 | 6.13 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.17 | 17.00 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.85 | 15.78 | 322% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 45.22 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement