KBRLF
Price
$25.04
Change
-$0.37 (-1.46%)
Updated
Jul 17 closing price
Capitalization
270.37M
LTRE
Price
$0.31
Change
+$0.01 (+3.33%)
Updated
Jul 16 closing price
Capitalization
6.61M
Interact to see
Advertisement

KBRLF vs LTRE

Header iconKBRLF vs LTRE Comparison
Open Charts KBRLF vs LTREBanner chart's image
K-Bro Linen
Price$25.04
Change-$0.37 (-1.46%)
Volume$200
Capitalization270.37M
Learning Tree International
Price$0.31
Change+$0.01 (+3.33%)
Volume$100
Capitalization6.61M
KBRLF vs LTRE Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
KBRLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LTRE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KBRLF vs. LTRE commentary
Jul 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KBRLF is a Hold and LTRE is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2025
Stock price -- (KBRLF: $25.04 vs. LTRE: $0.31)
Brand notoriety: KBRLF and LTRE are both not notable
Both companies represent the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KBRLF: 50% vs. LTRE: 0%
Market capitalization -- KBRLF: $270.37M vs. LTRE: $6.61M
KBRLF [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] is valued at $270.37M. LTRE’s [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] market capitalization is $6.61M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $80.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $5.59B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KBRLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLTRE’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • KBRLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LTRE’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LTRE is a better buy in the long-term than KBRLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KBRLF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LTRE’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KBRLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LTRE’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KBRLF is a better buy in the short-term than LTRE.

Price Growth

KBRLF (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LTRE (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was +1.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.69%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (+1.02% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KBRLF($270M) has a higher market cap than LTRE($6.61M). LTRE YTD gains are higher at: 10.714 vs. KBRLF (-7.842). KBRLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 38.6M vs. LTRE (-287K). LTRE has more cash in the bank: 4.73M vs. KBRLF (957K). LTRE has less debt than KBRLF: LTRE (2.57M) vs KBRLF (107M). KBRLF has higher revenues than LTRE: KBRLF (286M) vs LTRE (64.3M).
KBRLFLTREKBRLF / LTRE
Capitalization270M6.61M4,083%
EBITDA38.6M-287K-13,449%
Gain YTD-7.84210.714-73%
P/E Ratio57.14N/A-
Revenue286M64.3M445%
Total Cash957K4.73M20%
Total Debt107M2.57M4,168%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KBRLF vs LTRE: Fundamental Ratings
KBRLF
LTRE
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
81100
SMR RATING
1..100
70100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7654
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
67100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KBRLF's Valuation (14) in the null industry is in the same range as LTRE (32). This means that KBRLF’s stock grew similarly to LTRE’s over the last 12 months.

KBRLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as LTRE (100). This means that KBRLF’s stock grew similarly to LTRE’s over the last 12 months.

KBRLF's SMR Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as LTRE (100). This means that KBRLF’s stock grew similarly to LTRE’s over the last 12 months.

LTRE's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as KBRLF (76). This means that LTRE’s stock grew similarly to KBRLF’s over the last 12 months.

KBRLF's P/E Growth Rating (67) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LTRE (100). This means that KBRLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LTRE’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KBRLFLTRE
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
14%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
28%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
25%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
34%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
31%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KBRLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LTRE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KALA8.091.09
+15.57%
Kala BIO
TPCFF0.52N/A
N/A
Titan Logix Corp.
AHOTF0.33N/A
N/A
American Hotel Income Properties REIT LP
AJMPF2.18N/A
N/A
Ashmore Group Plc.
YKLTY8.65-0.66
-7.09%
Yakult Honsha Co., Ltd.

KBRLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KBRLF and WOLTF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KBRLF and WOLTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KBRLF
1D Price
Change %
KBRLF100%
N/A
WOLTF - KBRLF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.63%
KMNCF - KBRLF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LOIMF - KBRLF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LTRE - KBRLF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IPSOF - KBRLF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

LTRE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LTRE has been loosely correlated with UNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LTRE jumps, then UNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LTRE
1D Price
Change %
LTRE100%
N/A
UNF - LTRE
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.62%
LZ - LTRE
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.44%
JFIL - LTRE
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PCSV - LTRE
13%
Poorly correlated
-0.22%
PGINF - LTRE
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More