KBRLF
Price
$25.44
Change
+$0.23 (+0.91%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
270.37M
KMNCF
Price
$0.26
Change
-$0.03 (-10.34%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
50.81M
Interact to see
Advertisement

KBRLF vs KMNCF

Header iconKBRLF vs KMNCF Comparison
Open Charts KBRLF vs KMNCFBanner chart's image
K-Bro Linen
Price$25.44
Change+$0.23 (+0.91%)
Volume$100
Capitalization270.37M
Kingsmen Creatives
Price$0.26
Change-$0.03 (-10.34%)
Volume$32K
Capitalization50.81M
KBRLF vs KMNCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
KBRLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KMNCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KBRLF vs. KMNCF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KBRLF is a Hold and KMNCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (KBRLF: $25.44 vs. KMNCF: $0.26)
Brand notoriety: KBRLF and KMNCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KBRLF: 22% vs. KMNCF: 418%
Market capitalization -- KBRLF: $270.37M vs. KMNCF: $50.81M
KBRLF [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] is valued at $270.37M. KMNCF’s [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] market capitalization is $50.81M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $80.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $5.59B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KBRLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKMNCF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • KBRLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KMNCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, KMNCF is a better buy in the long-term than KBRLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KBRLF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KMNCF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KBRLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • KMNCF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both KBRLF and KMNCF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

KBRLF (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while KMNCF (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was +0.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.21%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (+0.86% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KBRLF($270M) has a higher market cap than KMNCF($50.8M). KBRLF has higher P/E ratio than KMNCF: KBRLF (57.14) vs KMNCF (13.00). KMNCF YTD gains are higher at: 51.347 vs. KBRLF (-6.370). KBRLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 38.6M vs. KMNCF (8.97M). KMNCF has more cash in the bank: 72.4M vs. KBRLF (957K). KMNCF has less debt than KBRLF: KMNCF (35.7M) vs KBRLF (107M). KBRLF (286M) and KMNCF (278M) have equivalent revenues.
KBRLFKMNCFKBRLF / KMNCF
Capitalization270M50.8M531%
EBITDA38.6M8.97M430%
Gain YTD-6.37051.347-12%
P/E Ratio57.1413.00439%
Revenue286M278M103%
Total Cash957K72.4M1%
Total Debt107M35.7M300%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KBRLF vs KMNCF: Fundamental Ratings
KBRLF
KMNCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6824
SMR RATING
1..100
7087
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5741
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6599
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KMNCF's Valuation (4) in the null industry is in the same range as KBRLF (15). This means that KMNCF’s stock grew similarly to KBRLF’s over the last 12 months.

KMNCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KBRLF (68). This means that KMNCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than KBRLF’s over the last 12 months.

KBRLF's SMR Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as KMNCF (87). This means that KBRLF’s stock grew similarly to KMNCF’s over the last 12 months.

KMNCF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as KBRLF (57). This means that KMNCF’s stock grew similarly to KBRLF’s over the last 12 months.

KBRLF's P/E Growth Rating (65) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KMNCF (99). This means that KBRLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than KMNCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KBRLFKMNCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
27%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
22%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
28%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
8%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
25%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
20%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
22%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
7%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
38%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
33%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KBRLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KMNCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PHPPX12.870.19
+1.50%
Principal MidCap Growth R5
EFCNX22.850.31
+1.38%
Emerald Insights Investor
LOMGX34.540.41
+1.20%
Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities F3
GTSAX28.970.32
+1.12%
Invesco Small Cap Growth A
TESRX26.240.09
+0.34%
Franklin Mutual Shares R

KBRLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KBRLF and WOLTF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KBRLF and WOLTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KBRLF
1D Price
Change %
KBRLF100%
N/A
WOLTF - KBRLF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.53%
KMNCF - KBRLF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LOIMF - KBRLF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LTRE - KBRLF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IPSOF - KBRLF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

KMNCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KMNCF and SKIL have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KMNCF and SKIL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KMNCF
1D Price
Change %
KMNCF100%
N/A
SKIL - KMNCF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.55%
LOIMF - KMNCF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IKTSY - KMNCF
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.34%
IPSOF - KMNCF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KBRLF - KMNCF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More