KBCSY
Price
$58.01
Change
-$1.09 (-1.84%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
47.08B
LRCDF
Price
$22.68
Change
-$0.38 (-1.65%)
Updated
Oct 16 closing price
Capitalization
1B
Interact to see
Advertisement

KBCSY vs LRCDF

Header iconKBCSY vs LRCDF Comparison
Open Charts KBCSY vs LRCDFBanner chart's image
KBC Group SA
Price$58.01
Change-$1.09 (-1.84%)
Volume$69.95K
Capitalization47.08B
Laurentian Bank of Canada
Price$22.68
Change-$0.38 (-1.65%)
Volume$65.47K
Capitalization1B
KBCSY vs LRCDF Comparison Chart in %
KBCSY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LRCDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KBCSY vs. LRCDF commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KBCSY is a Hold and LRCDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (KBCSY: $58.01 vs. LRCDF: $22.68)
Brand notoriety: KBCSY and LRCDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KBCSY: 269% vs. LRCDF: 1710%
Market capitalization -- KBCSY: $47.08B vs. LRCDF: $1B
KBCSY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $47.08B. LRCDF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $175.05B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KBCSY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileLRCDF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • KBCSY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • LRCDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, KBCSY is a better buy in the long-term than LRCDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KBCSY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LRCDF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KBCSY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • LRCDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LRCDF is a better buy in the short-term than KBCSY.

Price Growth

KBCSY (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.17% price change this week, while LRCDF (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.65% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.72%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.16% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KBCSY($47.1B) has a higher market cap than LRCDF($1B). KBCSY has higher P/E ratio than LRCDF: KBCSY (11.44) vs LRCDF (10.45). KBCSY YTD gains are higher at: 56.274 vs. LRCDF (13.570). LRCDF has less debt than KBCSY: LRCDF (15.6B) vs KBCSY (26.4B). KBCSY has higher revenues than LRCDF: KBCSY (11.6B) vs LRCDF (975M).
KBCSYLRCDFKBCSY / LRCDF
Capitalization47.1B1B4,696%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD56.27413.570415%
P/E Ratio11.4410.45110%
Revenue11.6B975M1,190%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt26.4B15.6B169%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KBCSY vs LRCDF: Fundamental Ratings
KBCSY
LRCDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7112
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
59
Fair valued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
14100
SMR RATING
1..100
614
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4354
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2747
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LRCDF's Valuation (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KBCSY (59). This means that LRCDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than KBCSY’s over the last 12 months.

KBCSY's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LRCDF (100). This means that KBCSY’s stock grew significantly faster than LRCDF’s over the last 12 months.

KBCSY's SMR Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as LRCDF (14). This means that KBCSY’s stock grew similarly to LRCDF’s over the last 12 months.

KBCSY's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as LRCDF (54). This means that KBCSY’s stock grew similarly to LRCDF’s over the last 12 months.

KBCSY's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the null industry is in the same range as LRCDF (47). This means that KBCSY’s stock grew similarly to LRCDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KBCSYLRCDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
47%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
55%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KBCSY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LRCDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FICEX17.730.08
+0.45%
Frost Growth Equity Inst
WGFIX12.050.02
+0.17%
William Blair Global Leaders I
AMLPX8.970.01
+0.11%
MainGate MLP A
JHUJX38.53-0.03
-0.08%
JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity R2
MADCX29.18-0.17
-0.58%
BlackRock Emerging Mkts Instl

KBCSY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KBCSY has been loosely correlated with BNPQY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KBCSY jumps, then BNPQY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KBCSY
1D Price
Change %
KBCSY100%
-1.84%
BNPQY - KBCSY
54%
Loosely correlated
-2.37%
ISNPY - KBCSY
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.68%
HBAN - KBCSY
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.85%
SCGLY - KBCSY
53%
Loosely correlated
-3.43%
TFC - KBCSY
51%
Loosely correlated
+3.67%
More

LRCDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LRCDF and SFBS have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LRCDF and SFBS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LRCDF
1D Price
Change %
LRCDF100%
N/A
SFBS - LRCDF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.56%
CATY - LRCDF
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.01%
BANR - LRCDF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.07%
KBCSY - LRCDF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.84%
FFBC - LRCDF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.98%
More