KBCSY
Price
$58.69
Change
+$0.94 (+1.63%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
46.45B
LRCDF
Price
$24.13
Change
-$0.25 (-1.03%)
Updated
Sep 19 closing price
Capitalization
1.05B
Interact to see
Advertisement

KBCSY vs LRCDF

Header iconKBCSY vs LRCDF Comparison
Open Charts KBCSY vs LRCDFBanner chart's image
KBC Group SA
Price$58.69
Change+$0.94 (+1.63%)
Volume$21.64K
Capitalization46.45B
Laurentian Bank of Canada
Price$24.13
Change-$0.25 (-1.03%)
Volume$62.55K
Capitalization1.05B
KBCSY vs LRCDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
KBCSY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LRCDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KBCSY vs. LRCDF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KBCSY is a StrongBuy and LRCDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (KBCSY: $58.69 vs. LRCDF: $24.13)
Brand notoriety: KBCSY and LRCDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KBCSY: 72% vs. LRCDF: 557%
Market capitalization -- KBCSY: $46.45B vs. LRCDF: $1.05B
KBCSY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $46.45B. LRCDF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.05B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $163.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KBCSY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileLRCDF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • KBCSY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • LRCDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, KBCSY is a better buy in the long-term than LRCDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KBCSY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LRCDF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KBCSY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • LRCDF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LRCDF is a better buy in the short-term than KBCSY.

Price Growth

KBCSY (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.41% price change this week, while LRCDF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.92%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KBCSY($46.5B) has a higher market cap than LRCDF($1.05B). KBCSY (11.48) and LRCDF (11.00) have similar P/E ratio . KBCSY YTD gains are higher at: 58.106 vs. LRCDF (20.831). LRCDF has less debt than KBCSY: LRCDF (15.6B) vs KBCSY (26.4B). KBCSY has higher revenues than LRCDF: KBCSY (11.6B) vs LRCDF (975M).
KBCSYLRCDFKBCSY / LRCDF
Capitalization46.5B1.05B4,446%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD58.10620.831279%
P/E Ratio11.4811.00104%
Revenue11.6B975M1,190%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt26.4B15.6B169%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KBCSY vs LRCDF: Fundamental Ratings
KBCSY
LRCDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1686
SMR RATING
1..100
614
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4447
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3340
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7543

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LRCDF's Valuation (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KBCSY (55). This means that LRCDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than KBCSY’s over the last 12 months.

KBCSY's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LRCDF (86). This means that KBCSY’s stock grew significantly faster than LRCDF’s over the last 12 months.

KBCSY's SMR Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as LRCDF (14). This means that KBCSY’s stock grew similarly to LRCDF’s over the last 12 months.

KBCSY's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as LRCDF (47). This means that KBCSY’s stock grew similarly to LRCDF’s over the last 12 months.

KBCSY's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the null industry is in the same range as LRCDF (40). This means that KBCSY’s stock grew similarly to LRCDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KBCSYLRCDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
46%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
34%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KBCSY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LRCDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RTRRX8.140.07
+0.87%
Royce Small-Cap Total Return R
IBGIX19.860.17
+0.86%
VY® Baron Growth I
ALPCX11.130.09
+0.82%
American Century Focused Lg Cap Val C
WCMVX20.230.13
+0.65%
WCM Focused International Equity Ins
RGLBX27.080.16
+0.59%
American Funds Global Insight R-2

KBCSY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KBCSY has been loosely correlated with SCGLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KBCSY jumps, then SCGLY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KBCSY
1D Price
Change %
KBCSY100%
+1.63%
SCGLY - KBCSY
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.43%
ISNPY - KBCSY
51%
Loosely correlated
+2.57%
BNPQY - KBCSY
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.34%
UNCRY - KBCSY
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.49%
NRDBY - KBCSY
40%
Loosely correlated
+2.71%
More

LRCDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LRCDF and KBCSY have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LRCDF and KBCSY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LRCDF
1D Price
Change %
LRCDF100%
N/A
KBCSY - LRCDF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.63%
BBAJF - LRCDF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SPXXF - LRCDF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BPXXY - LRCDF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DNBBY - LRCDF
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.44%
More