KB
Price
$81.88
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
29.85B
67 days until earnings call
WF
Price
$54.77
Change
-$0.31 (-0.56%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
13.53B
67 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

KB vs WF

Header iconKB vs WF Comparison
Open Charts KB vs WFBanner chart's image
KB Financial Group
Price$81.88
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$128.59K
Capitalization29.85B
Woori Financial Group
Price$54.77
Change-$0.31 (-0.56%)
Volume$29.28K
Capitalization13.53B
KB vs WF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
KB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KB vs. WF commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KB is a Hold and WF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (KB: $81.88 vs. WF: $54.77)
Brand notoriety: KB and WF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KB: 53% vs. WF: 42%
Market capitalization -- KB: $29.85B vs. WF: $13.53B
KB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $29.85B. WF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $13.53B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $174.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • KB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, KB is a better buy in the long-term than WF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KB is a better buy in the short-term than WF.

Price Growth

KB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.24% price change this week, while WF (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

KB is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

WF is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.64% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KB($29.9B) has a higher market cap than WF($13.5B). KB has higher P/E ratio than WF: KB (7.67) vs WF (6.82). WF YTD gains are higher at: 77.307 vs. KB (45.352). WF has less debt than KB: WF (79.95T) vs KB (126.05T). KB has higher revenues than WF: KB (19.92T) vs WF (12.73T).
KBWFKB / WF
Capitalization29.9B13.5B221%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD45.35277.30759%
P/E Ratio7.676.82112%
Revenue19.92T12.73T156%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt126.05T79.95T158%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KB vs WF: Fundamental Ratings
KB
WF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
714
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1713
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4239
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5716
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KB's Valuation (39) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WF (66) in the Major Banks industry. This means that KB’s stock grew similarly to WF’s over the last 12 months.

WF's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as KB (17) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WF’s stock grew similarly to KB’s over the last 12 months.

WF's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as KB (1) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WF’s stock grew similarly to KB’s over the last 12 months.

WF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as KB (42) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WF’s stock grew similarly to KB’s over the last 12 months.

WF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KB (57) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WF’s stock grew somewhat faster than KB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KBWF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PGP8.450.04
+0.48%
PIMCO Global StockPLUS & Income Fund
OILD12.960.06
+0.47%
MicroSectorsTM Ol&Gs E&P -3X Inv Lg ETNs
XSOE35.570.10
+0.28%
WisdomTree EmMkts ex-Stt-Ownd EntrprsETF
NEWZ28.330.08
+0.27%
EA Series Trust StockSnips AI-Powered Sentiment US All Cap ETF
TFLR51.55-0.01
-0.02%
T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF

KB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KB has been closely correlated with SHG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KB jumps, then SHG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KB
1D Price
Change %
KB100%
-2.13%
SHG - KB
80%
Closely correlated
-0.99%
WF - KB
73%
Closely correlated
-0.70%
USB - KB
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.47%
FCNCA - KB
33%
Loosely correlated
+1.08%
SNV - KB
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.42%
More

WF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WF has been closely correlated with SHG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WF jumps, then SHG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WF
1D Price
Change %
WF100%
-0.56%
SHG - WF
78%
Closely correlated
-0.04%
KB - WF
73%
Closely correlated
N/A
NWG - WF
38%
Loosely correlated
-2.24%
BSAC - WF
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.71%
BCH - WF
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.10%
More