KARO
Price
$38.14
Change
-$4.26 (-10.05%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
62 days until earnings call
RMDEF
Price
$20.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Ad is loading...

KARO vs RMDEF

Header iconKARO vs RMDEF Comparison
Open Charts KARO vs RMDEFBanner chart's image
Karooooo
Price$38.14
Change-$4.26 (-10.05%)
Volume$63.15K
CapitalizationN/A
REMEDY ENTMT OYJ
Price$20.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$138
CapitalizationN/A
KARO vs RMDEF Comparison Chart
Loading...
KARO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KARO vs. RMDEF commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KARO is a Hold and RMDEF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (KARO: $38.14 vs. RMDEF: $20.00)
Brand notoriety: KARO and RMDEF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KARO: 164% vs. RMDEF: 100%
Market capitalization -- KARO: $770.68M vs. RMDEF: $371.42M
KARO [@Packaged Software] is valued at $770.68M. RMDEF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $371.42M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KARO’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRMDEF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • KARO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RMDEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, KARO is a better buy in the long-term than RMDEF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KARO’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • KARO’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

KARO (@Packaged Software) experienced а -3.59% price change this week, while RMDEF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.96%.

Reported Earning Dates

KARO is expected to report earnings on Jan 16, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+0.05% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KARO($771M) has a higher market cap than RMDEF($371M). RMDEF has higher P/E ratio than KARO: RMDEF (26.11) vs KARO (21.67). KARO YTD gains are higher at: 61.739 vs. RMDEF (-23.225). KARO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.02B vs. RMDEF (1.46M). KARO has more cash in the bank: 782M vs. RMDEF (49M). RMDEF has less debt than KARO: RMDEF (2.99M) vs KARO (250M). KARO has higher revenues than RMDEF: KARO (4.03B) vs RMDEF (43.6M).
KARORMDEFKARO / RMDEF
Capitalization771M371M208%
EBITDA1.02B1.46M69,604%
Gain YTD61.739-23.225-266%
P/E Ratio21.6726.1183%
Revenue4.03B43.6M9,250%
Total Cash782M49M1,596%
Total Debt250M2.99M8,356%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KARO
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
KARO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

KARO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KARO and PDFS have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KARO and PDFS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KARO
1D Price
Change %
KARO100%
-10.05%
PDFS - KARO
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.45%
SNPS - KARO
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.73%
CDNS - KARO
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.12%
RMDEF - KARO
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ATIXF - KARO
24%
Poorly correlated
+36.00%
More

RMDEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RMDEF has been loosely correlated with EMOR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RMDEF jumps, then EMOR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMDEF
1D Price
Change %
RMDEF100%
N/A
EMOR - RMDEF
48%
Loosely correlated
-13.17%
BTGHF - RMDEF
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
LSPKF - RMDEF
43%
Loosely correlated
N/A
IONI - RMDEF
43%
Loosely correlated
-7.92%
ROIUF - RMDEF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More