K
Price
$78.94
Change
-$0.56 (-0.70%)
Updated
Sep 2 closing price
Capitalization
27.45B
57 days until earnings call
NIPMY
Price
$17.00
Change
+$0.75 (+4.62%)
Updated
Aug 2 closing price
Capitalization
3.81B
Interact to see
Advertisement

K vs NIPMY

Header iconK vs NIPMY Comparison
Open Charts K vs NIPMYBanner chart's image
Kellanova
Price$78.94
Change-$0.56 (-0.70%)
Volume$2.3M
Capitalization27.45B
NH Foods
Price$17.00
Change+$0.75 (+4.62%)
Volume$405
Capitalization3.81B
K vs NIPMY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
K vs. NIPMY commentary
Sep 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is K is a StrongBuy and NIPMY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 03, 2025
Stock price -- (K: $78.94 vs. NIPMY: $17.00)
Brand notoriety: K and NIPMY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: K: 92% vs. NIPMY: 100%
Market capitalization -- K: $27.45B vs. NIPMY: $3.81B
K [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $27.45B. NIPMY’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $3.81B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $240.71B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $7.07B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

K’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNIPMY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • K’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NIPMY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, K is a better buy in the long-term than NIPMY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

K’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • K’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

K (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а -1.09% price change this week, while NIPMY (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -0.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +659.15%.

Reported Earning Dates

K is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (-0.35% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
K($27.4B) has a higher market cap than NIPMY($3.81B). K has higher P/E ratio than NIPMY: K (20.66) vs NIPMY (18.62). NIPMY YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. K (-1.150). NIPMY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 82.1B vs. K (2.26B). NIPMY has more cash in the bank: 79B vs. K (354M). K has less debt than NIPMY: K (6.48B) vs NIPMY (236B). NIPMY has higher revenues than K: NIPMY (1.34T) vs K (12.6B).
KNIPMYK / NIPMY
Capitalization27.4B3.81B720%
EBITDA2.26B82.1B3%
Gain YTD-1.1500.000-
P/E Ratio20.6618.62111%
Revenue12.6B1.34T1%
Total Cash354M79B0%
Total Debt6.48B236B3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
K vs NIPMY: Fundamental Ratings
K
NIPMY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7445
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
37100
SMR RATING
1..100
2637
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5971
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8966
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7545

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NIPMY's Valuation (33) in the null industry is in the same range as K (34) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that NIPMY’s stock grew similarly to K’s over the last 12 months.

K's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the Food Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NIPMY (100) in the null industry. This means that K’s stock grew somewhat faster than NIPMY’s over the last 12 months.

K's SMR Rating (26) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as NIPMY (37) in the null industry. This means that K’s stock grew similarly to NIPMY’s over the last 12 months.

K's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as NIPMY (71) in the null industry. This means that K’s stock grew similarly to NIPMY’s over the last 12 months.

NIPMY's P/E Growth Rating (66) in the null industry is in the same range as K (89) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that NIPMY’s stock grew similarly to K’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KNIPMY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
34%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
38%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
9%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
32%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
10%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
43%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
33%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
25%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
32%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ETQ1.700.06
+3.35%
T-REX 2X Inverse Ether Daily Target ETF
IBB140.412.19
+1.58%
iShares Biotechnology ETF
FOVL73.39N/A
N/A
iShares Focused Value Factor ETF
SMIZ36.24-0.15
-0.40%
Zacks Small/Mid Cap ETF
STK31.34-0.39
-1.23%
Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund

K and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, K has been loosely correlated with MKC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if K jumps, then MKC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To K
1D Price
Change %
K100%
-0.70%
MKC - K
35%
Loosely correlated
-2.23%
POST - K
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.48%
KHC - K
30%
Poorly correlated
-6.97%
GIS - K
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.02%
HAIN - K
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.56%
More

NIPMY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NIPMY and DANOY have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NIPMY and DANOY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NIPMY
1D Price
Change %
NIPMY100%
N/A
DANOY - NIPMY
26%
Poorly correlated
+2.41%
GPDNF - NIPMY
23%
Poorly correlated
+4.55%
K - NIPMY
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.70%
NSRGY - NIPMY
18%
Poorly correlated
-0.83%
NSRGF - NIPMY
17%
Poorly correlated
-0.29%
More