K
Price
$80.78
Change
+$0.14 (+0.17%)
Updated
Sep 27 closing price
33 days until earnings call
MDLZ
Price
$74.20
Change
-$0.12 (-0.16%)
Updated
Sep 27 closing price
31 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

K vs MDLZ

Header iconK vs MDLZ Comparison
Open Charts K vs MDLZBanner chart's image
Kellanova
Price$80.78
Change+$0.14 (+0.17%)
Volume$1.33M
CapitalizationN/A
Mondelez International
Price$74.20
Change-$0.12 (-0.16%)
Volume$4.7M
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
K vs MDLZ Comparison Chart
Loading...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
MDLZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
K vs. MDLZ commentary
Sep 29, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is K is a Hold and MDLZ is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2024
Stock price -- (K: $80.16 vs. MDLZ: $72.25)
Brand notoriety: K: Not notable vs. MDLZ: Notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: K: 63% vs. MDLZ: 118%
Market capitalization -- K: $19.5B vs. MDLZ: $94.25B
K [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $19.5B. MDLZ’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $94.25B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $8.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

K’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileMDLZ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • K’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • MDLZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, K is a better buy in the long-term than MDLZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

K’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MDLZ’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • K’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MDLZ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, K is a better buy in the short-term than MDLZ.

Price Growth

K (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -0.07% price change this week, while MDLZ (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +1.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +0.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.75%.

Reported Earning Dates

K is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2024.

MDLZ is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+0.61% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDLZ($94.3B) has a higher market cap than K($19.5B). K has higher P/E ratio than MDLZ: K (25.36) vs MDLZ (19.27). K YTD gains are higher at: 47.216 vs. MDLZ (1.005). MDLZ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.65B vs. K (1.76B). MDLZ has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. K (274M). K has less debt than MDLZ: K (6.53B) vs MDLZ (19.9B). MDLZ has higher revenues than K: MDLZ (36B) vs K (13.1B).
KMDLZK / MDLZ
Capitalization19.5B94.3B21%
EBITDA1.76B7.65B23%
Gain YTD47.2161.0054,698%
P/E Ratio25.3619.27132%
Revenue13.1B36B36%
Total Cash274M1.81B15%
Total Debt6.53B19.9B33%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
K vs MDLZ: Fundamental Ratings
K
MDLZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3113
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1522
SMR RATING
1..100
3952
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
152
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3055
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

K's Valuation (29) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as MDLZ (34). This means that K’s stock grew similarly to MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.

K's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as MDLZ (22). This means that K’s stock grew similarly to MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.

K's SMR Rating (39) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as MDLZ (52). This means that K’s stock grew similarly to MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.

K's Price Growth Rating (1) in the Food Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MDLZ (52). This means that K’s stock grew somewhat faster than MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.

K's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as MDLZ (55). This means that K’s stock grew similarly to MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KMDLZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 2 months ago
51%
Bullish Trend about 2 months ago
50%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
MDLZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME23.14-0.28
-1.20%
GameStop Corp
TSLA210.60-3.51
-1.64%
Tesla
SPY552.08-11.60
-2.06%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL222.77-6.23
-2.72%
Apple
BTC.X57431.023000-1681.457000
-2.84%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency

K and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, K has been loosely correlated with MDLZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if K jumps, then MDLZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To K
1D Price
Change %
K100%
+0.15%
MDLZ - K
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.61%
MKC - K
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.46%
INGR - K
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.01%
KHC - K
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.45%
HSY - K
37%
Loosely correlated
+2.22%
More

MDLZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDLZ has been loosely correlated with HSY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MDLZ jumps, then HSY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MDLZ
1D Price
Change %
MDLZ100%
+0.61%
HSY - MDLZ
60%
Loosely correlated
+2.22%
KHC - MDLZ
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.45%
CAG - MDLZ
60%
Loosely correlated
+2.31%
FLO - MDLZ
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.39%
K - MDLZ
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.15%
More