K
Price
$81.77
Change
-$0.04 (-0.05%)
Updated
May 15, 02:12 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
19.5B
77 days until earnings call
LANC
Price
$167.66
Change
+$2.18 (+1.32%)
Updated
May 15, 02:11 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.67B
98 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

K vs LANC

Header iconK vs LANC Comparison
Open Charts K vs LANCBanner chart's image
Kellanova
Price$81.77
Change-$0.04 (-0.05%)
Volume$1.9K
Capitalization19.5B
Lancaster Colony
Price$167.66
Change+$2.18 (+1.32%)
Volume$100
Capitalization5.67B
K vs LANC Comparison Chart
Loading...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LANC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
K vs. LANC commentary
May 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is K is a Hold and LANC is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 15, 2025
Stock price -- (K: $81.80 vs. LANC: $165.48)
Brand notoriety: K and LANC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: K: 145% vs. LANC: 83%
Market capitalization -- K: $19.5B vs. LANC: $5.67B
K [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $19.5B. LANC’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $5.67B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

K’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLANC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • K’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LANC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, K is a better buy in the long-term than LANC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

K’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LANC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • K’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LANC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, K is a better buy in the short-term than LANC.

Price Growth

K (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -0.92% price change this week, while LANC (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +3.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +0.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.94%.

Reported Earning Dates

K is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

LANC is expected to report earnings on Aug 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+0.50% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
K($19.5B) has a higher market cap than LANC($5.67B). LANC has higher P/E ratio than K: LANC (43.94) vs K (25.36). K YTD gains are higher at: 1.725 vs. LANC (-3.949). K has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.76B vs. LANC (244M). K has more cash in the bank: 274M vs. LANC (134M). LANC has less debt than K: LANC (13.3M) vs K (6.53B). K has higher revenues than LANC: K (13.1B) vs LANC (1.87B).
KLANCK / LANC
Capitalization19.5B5.67B344%
EBITDA1.76B244M722%
Gain YTD1.725-3.949-44%
P/E Ratio25.3643.9458%
Revenue13.1B1.87B702%
Total Cash274M134M204%
Total Debt6.53B13.3M49,068%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
K vs LANC: Fundamental Ratings
K
LANC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6962
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2662
SMR RATING
1..100
2652
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5079
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7687
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

K's Valuation (39) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as LANC (60) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that K’s stock grew similarly to LANC’s over the last 12 months.

K's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the Food Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LANC (62) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that K’s stock grew somewhat faster than LANC’s over the last 12 months.

K's SMR Rating (26) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as LANC (52) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that K’s stock grew similarly to LANC’s over the last 12 months.

K's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as LANC (79) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that K’s stock grew similarly to LANC’s over the last 12 months.

K's P/E Growth Rating (76) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as LANC (87) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that K’s stock grew similarly to LANC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KLANC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
34%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
35%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
28%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LANC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSLA347.6813.61
+4.07%
Tesla
GME28.730.34
+1.20%
GameStop Corp
SPY587.590.75
+0.13%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
AAPL212.33-0.60
-0.28%
Apple
BTC.X103539.414000-630.398440
-0.61%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency

K and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that K and SMPL have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that K and SMPL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To K
1D Price
Change %
K100%
-0.38%
SMPL - K
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.50%
HAIN - K
29%
Poorly correlated
-5.17%
DAR - K
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.60%
POST - K
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.41%
LANC - K
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.26%
More

LANC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LANC has been loosely correlated with JBSS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LANC jumps, then JBSS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LANC
1D Price
Change %
LANC100%
-1.26%
JBSS - LANC
56%
Loosely correlated
-2.38%
MDLZ - LANC
33%
Loosely correlated
-0.94%
FLO - LANC
31%
Poorly correlated
-2.71%
JJSF - LANC
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.72%
DAR - LANC
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.60%
More