K
Price
$82.06
Change
-$0.09 (-0.11%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
19.5B
54 days until earnings call
LANC
Price
$167.93
Change
+$0.84 (+0.50%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
5.67B
75 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

K vs LANC

Header iconK vs LANC Comparison
Open Charts K vs LANCBanner chart's image
Kellanova
Price$82.06
Change-$0.09 (-0.11%)
Volume$1.45M
Capitalization19.5B
Lancaster Colony
Price$167.93
Change+$0.84 (+0.50%)
Volume$109.61K
Capitalization5.67B
K vs LANC Comparison Chart
Loading...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LANC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
K vs. LANC commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is K is a Buy and LANC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (K: $82.26 vs. LANC: $164.68)
Brand notoriety: K and LANC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: K: 71% vs. LANC: 90%
Market capitalization -- K: $19.5B vs. LANC: $5.67B
K [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $19.5B. LANC’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $5.67B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

K’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLANC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • K’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LANC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, K is a better buy in the long-term than LANC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

K’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LANC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • K’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LANC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both K and LANC are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

K (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +0.16% price change this week, while LANC (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +0.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.42%.

Reported Earning Dates

K is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

LANC is expected to report earnings on Aug 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.46% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
K($19.5B) has a higher market cap than LANC($5.67B). LANC has higher P/E ratio than K: LANC (43.94) vs K (25.36). K YTD gains are higher at: 2.297 vs. LANC (-4.413). K has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.76B vs. LANC (244M). K has more cash in the bank: 274M vs. LANC (134M). LANC has less debt than K: LANC (13.3M) vs K (6.53B). K has higher revenues than LANC: K (13.1B) vs LANC (1.87B).
KLANCK / LANC
Capitalization19.5B5.67B344%
EBITDA1.76B244M722%
Gain YTD2.297-4.413-52%
P/E Ratio25.3643.9458%
Revenue13.1B1.87B702%
Total Cash274M134M204%
Total Debt6.53B13.3M49,068%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
K vs LANC: Fundamental Ratings
K
LANC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
107
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
40
Fair valued
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2457
SMR RATING
1..100
2652
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4878
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7284
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

K's Valuation (40) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as LANC (60) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that K’s stock grew similarly to LANC’s over the last 12 months.

K's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Food Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LANC (57) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that K’s stock grew somewhat faster than LANC’s over the last 12 months.

K's SMR Rating (26) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as LANC (52) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that K’s stock grew similarly to LANC’s over the last 12 months.

K's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as LANC (78) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that K’s stock grew similarly to LANC’s over the last 12 months.

K's P/E Growth Rating (72) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as LANC (84) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that K’s stock grew similarly to LANC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KLANC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
45%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
45%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
32%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LANC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL200.420.21
+0.10%
Apple
SPY587.73-3.42
-0.58%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
BTC.X107802.330000-1192.312500
-1.09%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA356.90-5.99
-1.65%
Tesla
GME31.21-3.80
-10.85%
GameStop Corp

K and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that K and SMPL have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that K and SMPL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To K
1D Price
Change %
K100%
-0.29%
SMPL - K
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.63%
HAIN - K
29%
Poorly correlated
-5.45%
DAR - K
28%
Poorly correlated
-2.72%
POST - K
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.10%
LANC - K
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.02%
More

LANC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LANC has been loosely correlated with JBSS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LANC jumps, then JBSS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LANC
1D Price
Change %
LANC100%
-2.02%
JBSS - LANC
51%
Loosely correlated
-1.20%
FLO - LANC
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.06%
MDLZ - LANC
33%
Loosely correlated
-0.42%
JJSF - LANC
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.71%
CENTA - LANC
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.08%
More