JZXN
Price
$0.23
Change
-$0.01 (-4.17%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
11.54M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TLF
Price
$2.89
Change
-$0.05 (-1.70%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
23.32M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

JZXN vs TLF

Header iconJZXN vs TLF Comparison
Open Charts JZXN vs TLFBanner chart's image
Jiuzi Holdings
Price$0.23
Change-$0.01 (-4.17%)
Volume$1.75M
Capitalization11.54M
Tandy Leather Factory
Price$2.89
Change-$0.05 (-1.70%)
Volume$30.41K
Capitalization23.32M
JZXN vs TLF Comparison Chart in %
JZXN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TLF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
JZXN vs. TLF commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JZXN is a Hold and TLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (JZXN: $0.23 vs. TLF: $2.89)
Brand notoriety: JZXN and TLF are both not notable
JZXN represents the Automotive Aftermarket, while TLF is part of the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: JZXN: 24% vs. TLF: 233%
Market capitalization -- JZXN: $11.54M vs. TLF: $23.32M
JZXN [@Automotive Aftermarket] is valued at $11.54M. TLF’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $23.32M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry ranges from $45.05B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $47.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry is $3.56B. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $3.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

JZXN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • JZXN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TLF is a better buy in the long-term than JZXN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

JZXN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TLF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • JZXN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • TLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, JZXN is a better buy in the short-term than TLF.

Price Growth

JZXN (@Automotive Aftermarket) experienced а -8.92% price change this week, while TLF (@Specialty Stores) price change was -0.69% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was -0.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.13%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +0.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.03%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Automotive Aftermarket (-0.48% weekly)

The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).

@Specialty Stores (+0.39% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TLF($23.3M) has a higher market cap than JZXN($11.5M). TLF has higher P/E ratio than JZXN: TLF (36.13) vs JZXN (0.43). TLF YTD gains are higher at: -15.136 vs. JZXN (-82.768). TLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.3M vs. JZXN (-9.17M). JZXN has less debt than TLF: JZXN (391K) vs TLF (11.4M). TLF has higher revenues than JZXN: TLF (74.6M) vs JZXN (5.93M).
JZXNTLFJZXN / TLF
Capitalization11.5M23.3M49%
EBITDA-9.17M5.3M-173%
Gain YTD-82.768-15.136547%
P/E Ratio0.4336.131%
Revenue5.93M74.6M8%
Total CashN/A16.4M-
Total Debt391K11.4M3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TLF: Fundamental Ratings
TLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
64
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
72
SMR RATING
1..100
41
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
61
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
JZXNTLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
JZXN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TLF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SHG54.831.13
+2.10%
Shinhan Financial Group Co Ltd
BFRG1.09N/A
N/A
Bullfrog AI Holdings
VTEX4.07-0.02
-0.49%
VTEX
CFBK22.56-0.14
-0.62%
CF Bankshares
VCYT42.30-0.36
-0.84%
Veracyte

JZXN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JZXN and ULTA have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JZXN and ULTA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JZXN
1D Price
Change %
JZXN100%
-2.32%
ULTA - JZXN
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.40%
BBBY - JZXN
21%
Poorly correlated
-5.32%
CARG - JZXN
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.95%
BWMX - JZXN
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.77%
CHPT - JZXN
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.53%
More

TLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TLF and SPWH have been poorly correlated (+19% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TLF and SPWH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TLF
1D Price
Change %
TLF100%
-0.48%
SPWH - TLF
19%
Poorly correlated
-4.59%
CHPT - TLF
17%
Poorly correlated
-1.53%
LESL - TLF
13%
Poorly correlated
+2.95%
ONEW - TLF
11%
Poorly correlated
+2.79%
JZXN - TLF
9%
Poorly correlated
-2.32%
More