JWSMF
Price
$9.75
Change
+$0.06 (+0.62%)
Updated
Jun 17 closing price
Capitalization
299.26M
SLAMF
Price
$11.72
Change
-$0.08 (-0.68%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
438.8M
Interact to see
Advertisement

JWSMF vs SLAMF

Header iconJWSMF vs SLAMF Comparison
Open Charts JWSMF vs SLAMFBanner chart's image
Jaws Mustang Acquisition
Price$9.75
Change+$0.06 (+0.62%)
Volume$200
Capitalization299.26M
Slam
Price$11.72
Change-$0.08 (-0.68%)
Volume$9.42K
Capitalization438.8M
JWSMF vs SLAMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
JWSMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLAMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
JWSMF vs. SLAMF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JWSMF is a Hold and SLAMF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (JWSMF: $9.75 vs. SLAMF: $11.72)
Brand notoriety: JWSMF and SLAMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: JWSMF: 34% vs. SLAMF: 43%
Market capitalization -- JWSMF: $299.26M vs. SLAMF: $438.8M
JWSMF [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $299.26M. SLAMF’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $438.8M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

JWSMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSLAMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • JWSMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SLAMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, JWSMF is a better buy in the long-term than SLAMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

JWSMF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLAMF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • JWSMF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SLAMF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both JWSMF and SLAMF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

JWSMF (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SLAMF (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was -0.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -1.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.49%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-1.44% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLAMF($439M) has a higher market cap than JWSMF($299M). SLAMF has higher P/E ratio than JWSMF: SLAMF (65.00) vs JWSMF (52.24). SLAMF YTD gains are higher at: 3.260 vs. JWSMF (-7.231). JWSMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -121.91K vs. SLAMF (-3.36M). JWSMF has more cash in the bank: 211K vs. SLAMF (3.34K). JWSMF has less debt than SLAMF: JWSMF (1M) vs SLAMF (10.2M). JWSMF (0) and SLAMF (0) have equivalent revenues.
JWSMFSLAMFJWSMF / SLAMF
Capitalization299M439M68%
EBITDA-121.91K-3.36M4%
Gain YTD-7.2313.260-222%
P/E Ratio52.2465.0080%
Revenue00-
Total Cash211K3.34K6,321%
Total Debt1M10.2M10%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
JWSMFSLAMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
10%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
7%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
5%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
4%
N/A
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
4%
N/A
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
13%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
11%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
11%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
JWSMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLAMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RIFYX31.980.43
+1.36%
Victory RS Science and Technology Y
PFGRX35.520.37
+1.05%
Victory Pioneer Fundamental Growth R
TGPEX11.150.08
+0.72%
T. Rowe Price Global Impact Equity Inv
FOSBX30.280.17
+0.56%
Tributary Small Company Instl Plus
IASTX24.040.10
+0.42%
Macquarie Asset Strategy Fund Cl R6

JWSMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JWSMF and FORLU have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JWSMF and FORLU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JWSMF
1D Price
Change %
JWSMF100%
N/A
FORLU - JWSMF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PLMIU - JWSMF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IX - JWSMF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.31%
SLAMF - JWSMF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HYAC - JWSMF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.18%
More

SLAMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLAMF has been loosely correlated with KACLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SLAMF jumps, then KACLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLAMF
1D Price
Change %
SLAMF100%
N/A
KACLF - SLAMF
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MNTN - SLAMF
36%
Loosely correlated
+2.34%
PEGR - SLAMF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IRRX - SLAMF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IWSH - SLAMF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More