Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMTX vs PZFVX
JVMTX vs PZFVX Comparison
Open Charts JVMTX vs PZFVX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R4
Price$28.85
Change-$0.78 (-2.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.66B
JHancock Classic Value A
Price$19.34
Change-$5.76 (-22.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets518.96M
JVMTX vs PZFVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMTX vs. PZFVX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMTX is a Buy and PZFVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMTX has more cash in the bank: 24.7B vs. PZFVX (519M). PZFVX pays higher dividends than JVMTX: PZFVX (1.86) vs JVMTX (0.60). JVMTX was incepted earlier than PZFVX: JVMTX (13 years) vs PZFVX (30 years). PZFVX (1.16) is less costly to investors than JVMTX (1.10). JVMTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. PZFVX (29.00). JVMTX has a lower initial minimum investment than PZFVX: JVMTX (0) vs PZFVX (1000). JVMTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.79 vs. PZFVX (-20.44). JVMTX return over 5 years is better than : 22.28 vs. PZFVX (-37.24).
| JVMTX | PZFVX | JVMTX / PZFVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.15 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.16 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.177 | -0.206 | -2,508% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.7B | 519M | 4,759% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 1.86 | 32% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.79 | -20.44 | -23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.22 | -41.50 | -27% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.28 | -37.24 | -60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.80 | -0.49 | -15,623% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement