Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMTX vs PZFVX
JVMTX vs PZFVX Comparison
Open Charts JVMTX vs PZFVX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R4
Price$27.87
Change+$0.04 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.95B
JHancock Classic Value A
Price$19.69
Change+$0.03 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets559.13M
JVMTX vs PZFVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMTX vs. PZFVX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMTX is a Hold and PZFVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMTX has more cash in the bank: 23.9B vs. PZFVX (559M). PZFVX pays higher dividends than JVMTX: PZFVX (2.52) vs JVMTX (0.61). JVMTX was incepted earlier than PZFVX: JVMTX (13 years) vs PZFVX (30 years). PZFVX (1.16) is less costly to investors than JVMTX (1.10). JVMTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. PZFVX (29.00). JVMTX has a lower initial minimum investment than PZFVX: JVMTX (0) vs PZFVX (1000). JVMTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.35 vs. PZFVX (-17.37). JVMTX return over 5 years is better than : 23.38 vs. PZFVX (-33.35).
| JVMTX | PZFVX | JVMTX / PZFVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.15 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.16 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.567 | -16.355 | -22% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.9B | 559M | 4,275% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 2.52 | 24% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.35 | -17.37 | -14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.93 | -33.75 | -47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.38 | -33.35 | -70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.70 | -12.17 | -400% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers