Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMTX vs PQNCX
JVMTX vs PQNCX Comparison
Open Charts JVMTX vs PQNCX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R4
Price$27.57
Change-$0.32 (-1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.46B
Virtus NFJ Mid-Cap Value C
Price$17.25
Change-$0.29 (-1.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets580.3M
JVMTX vs PQNCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMTX vs. PQNCX commentary
Jun 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMTX is a StrongBuy and PQNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMTX has more cash in the bank: 21.5B vs. PQNCX (580M). PQNCX pays higher dividends than JVMTX: PQNCX (2.04) vs JVMTX (0.67). JVMTX was incepted earlier than PQNCX: JVMTX (12 years) vs PQNCX (37 years). PQNCX (1.84) is less costly to investors than JVMTX (1.11). PQNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. JVMTX (47.00). JVMTX has a lower initial minimum investment than PQNCX: JVMTX (0) vs PQNCX (2500). PQNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.19 vs. JVMTX (-3.01). JVMTX return over 5 years is better than : 51.48 vs. PQNCX (-11.81).
| JVMTX | PQNCX | JVMTX / PQNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.75 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.84 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.453 | -1.597 | -154% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.5B | 580M | 3,707% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 2.04 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.01 | 3.19 | -94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.50 | -19.99 | -83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.48 | -11.81 | -436% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.66 | -16.85 | -212% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers