Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMTX vs PQNAX
JVMTX vs PQNAX Comparison
Open Charts JVMTX vs PQNAX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R4
Price$27.57
Change-$0.32 (-1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.46B
Virtus NFJ Mid-Cap Value A
Price$25.08
Change-$0.42 (-1.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets580.3M
JVMTX vs PQNAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMTX vs. PQNAX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMTX is a StrongBuy and PQNAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMTX has more cash in the bank: 21.5B vs. PQNAX (580M). PQNAX pays higher dividends than JVMTX: PQNAX (1.86) vs JVMTX (0.67). JVMTX was incepted earlier than PQNAX: JVMTX (12 years) vs PQNAX (34 years). PQNAX (1.12) and JVMTX (1.11) have similar cost to investors . PQNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. JVMTX (47.00). JVMTX has a lower initial minimum investment than PQNAX: JVMTX (0) vs PQNAX (2500). PQNAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.92 vs. JVMTX (-3.01). JVMTX return over 5 years is better than : 51.48 vs. PQNAX (4.64).
| JVMTX | PQNAX | JVMTX / PQNAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.00 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.12 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.453 | -1.299 | -189% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.5B | 580M | 3,707% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 1.86 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.01 | 3.92 | -77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.50 | -9.11 | -181% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.48 | 4.64 | 1,110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.66 | 4.27 | 835% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers