Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMTX vs NMVZX
JVMTX vs NMVZX Comparison
Open Charts JVMTX vs NMVZX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R4
Price$27.57
Change-$0.32 (-1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.46B
Nuance Mid Cap Value Z
Price$11.86
Change-$0.17 (-1.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets514.39M
JVMTX vs NMVZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMTX vs. NMVZX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMTX is a StrongBuy and NMVZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMTX has more cash in the bank: 21.5B vs. NMVZX (514M). NMVZX pays higher dividends than JVMTX: NMVZX (3.74) vs JVMTX (0.67). JVMTX was incepted earlier than NMVZX: JVMTX (12 years) vs NMVZX (8 years). JVMTX (1.11) is less costly to investors than NMVZX (0.84). NMVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. JVMTX (47.00). JVMTX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMVZX: JVMTX (0) vs NMVZX (2500). NMVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.10 vs. JVMTX (-3.01). JVMTX return over 5 years is better than : 51.48 vs. NMVZX (4.51).
| JVMTX | NMVZX | JVMTX / NMVZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.79 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.84 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.453 | -2.363 | -104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.5B | 514M | 4,183% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 3.74 | 18% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.01 | -1.10 | 273% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.50 | -0.30 | -5,454% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.48 | 4.51 | 1,141% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.66 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers