Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMTX vs LMCCX
JVMTX vs LMCCX Comparison
Open Charts JVMTX vs LMCCX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R4
Price$30.10
Change+$0.45 (+1.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.32B
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock C
Price$30.30
Change+$0.08 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.13B
JVMTX vs LMCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMTX vs. LMCCX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMTX is a Buy and LMCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMTX has more cash in the bank: 24.3B vs. LMCCX (1.13B). JVMTX pays higher dividends than LMCCX: JVMTX (0.62) vs LMCCX (0.00). JVMTX was incepted earlier than LMCCX: JVMTX (12 years) vs LMCCX (28 years). LMCCX (1.78) is less costly to investors than JVMTX (1.10). LMCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. JVMTX (49.00). JVMTX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMCCX: JVMTX (0) vs LMCCX (1000). JVMTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.74 vs. LMCCX (-6.54). JVMTX return over 5 years is better than : 54.13 vs. LMCCX (32.64).
| JVMTX | LMCCX | JVMTX / LMCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.78 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.78 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.891 | -0.394 | -3,014% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.3B | 1.13B | 2,149% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.74 | -6.54 | -42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.58 | 14.05 | 175% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.13 | 32.64 | 166% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.10 | 30.66 | 186% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement