Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMSX vs WFPCX
JVMSX vs WFPCX Comparison
Open Charts JVMSX vs WFPCX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R2
Price$27.71
Change+$0.04 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.9B
Allspring Special Mid Cap Value C
Price$41.10
Change+$0.10 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.28B
JVMSX vs WFPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMSX vs. WFPCX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMSX is a Hold and WFPCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMSX has more cash in the bank: 23.9B vs. WFPCX (13.3B). JVMSX pays higher dividends than WFPCX: JVMSX (0.40) vs WFPCX (0.25). JVMSX was incepted earlier than WFPCX: JVMSX (14 years) vs WFPCX (18 years). WFPCX (1.87) is less costly to investors than JVMSX (1.25). JVMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. WFPCX (38.00). JVMSX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFPCX: JVMSX (0) vs WFPCX (1000). JVMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.33 vs. WFPCX (-5.30). JVMSX return over 5 years is better than : 22.07 vs. WFPCX (3.59).
| JVMSX | WFPCX | JVMSX / WFPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.87 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.87 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.357 | -4.240 | -79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.9B | 13.3B | 180% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.40 | 0.25 | 157% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.33 | -5.30 | -44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.34 | 2.25 | 681% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.07 | 3.59 | 615% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.11 | 43.28 | 109% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers