Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMSX vs WFPCX
JVMSX vs WFPCX Comparison
Open Charts JVMSX vs WFPCX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R2
Price$27.43
Change-$0.32 (-1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.46B
Allspring Special Mid Cap Value C
Price$42.42
Change-$0.53 (-1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.94B
JVMSX vs WFPCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMSX vs. WFPCX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMSX is a StrongBuy and WFPCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMSX has more cash in the bank: 21.5B vs. WFPCX (12.9B). JVMSX pays higher dividends than WFPCX: JVMSX (0.43) vs WFPCX (0.27). JVMSX was incepted earlier than WFPCX: JVMSX (13 years) vs WFPCX (18 years). WFPCX (1.87) is less costly to investors than JVMSX (1.26). JVMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. WFPCX (19.00). JVMSX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFPCX: JVMSX (0) vs WFPCX (1000). JVMSX (-3.29) and WFPCX (-3.38) have marching annual gain over last year. JVMSX return over 5 years is better than : 50.13 vs. WFPCX (32.78).
| JVMSX | WFPCX | JVMSX / WFPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.87 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.87 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.313 | -1.165 | -199% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.5B | 12.9B | 167% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.27 | 161% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.29 | -3.38 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.80 | 5.59 | 283% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.13 | 32.78 | 153% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.43 | 32.46 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers