Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMSX vs SMVZX
JVMSX vs SMVZX Comparison
Open Charts JVMSX vs SMVZX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R2
Price$29.24
Change+$0.18 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.06B
Virtus Ceredex Mid-Cap Value Equity R6
Price$12.65
Change+$0.09 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.61B
JVMSX vs SMVZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMSX vs. SMVZX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMSX is a StrongBuy and SMVZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMSX has more cash in the bank: 23.1B vs. SMVZX (1.61B). SMVZX pays higher dividends than JVMSX: SMVZX (1.17) vs JVMSX (0.42). JVMSX was incepted earlier than SMVZX: JVMSX (13 years) vs SMVZX (11 years). JVMSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than SMVZX (0.88). SMVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 141.00 vs. JVMSX (49.00). JVMSX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMVZX: JVMSX (0) vs SMVZX (2500000). SMVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.02 vs. JVMSX (0.75). JVMSX return over 5 years is better than : 55.91 vs. SMVZX (28.14).
| JVMSX | SMVZX | JVMSX / SMVZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.79 | 158% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.88 | 143% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.064 | 4.805 | 189% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.1B | 1.61B | 1,433% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.42 | 1.17 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.75 | 1.02 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.42 | 23.67 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.91 | 28.14 | 199% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.42 | 5.81 | 800% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers