Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMSX vs PZFVX
JVMSX vs PZFVX Comparison
Open Charts JVMSX vs PZFVX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R2
Price$28.72
Change-$0.74 (-2.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.73B
JHancock Classic Value A
Price$19.34
Change-$5.76 (-22.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets518.96M
JVMSX vs PZFVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMSX vs. PZFVX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMSX is a Buy and PZFVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMSX has more cash in the bank: 24.7B vs. PZFVX (519M). PZFVX pays higher dividends than JVMSX: PZFVX (1.86) vs JVMSX (0.37). JVMSX was incepted earlier than PZFVX: JVMSX (14 years) vs PZFVX (30 years). JVMSX (1.25) is less costly to investors than PZFVX (1.16). JVMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. PZFVX (29.00). JVMSX has a lower initial minimum investment than PZFVX: JVMSX (0) vs PZFVX (1000). JVMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.49 vs. PZFVX (-20.44). JVMSX return over 5 years is better than : 20.95 vs. PZFVX (-37.24).
| JVMSX | PZFVX | JVMSX / PZFVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.15 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.16 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.163 | -0.206 | -2,502% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.7B | 519M | 4,759% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.37 | 1.86 | 20% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.49 | -20.44 | -22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.32 | -41.50 | -25% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.95 | -37.24 | -56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.49 | -0.49 | -14,951% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement