Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMSX vs PZFVX
JVMSX vs PZFVX Comparison
Open Charts JVMSX vs PZFVX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R2
Price$30.08
Change+$0.28 (+0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.51B
JHancock Classic Value A
Price$25.57
Change+$0.37 (+1.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets566.78M
JVMSX vs PZFVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMSX vs. PZFVX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMSX is a Buy and PZFVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMSX has more cash in the bank: 24.5B vs. PZFVX (567M). PZFVX pays higher dividends than JVMSX: PZFVX (2.52) vs JVMSX (0.40). JVMSX was incepted earlier than PZFVX: JVMSX (14 years) vs PZFVX (29 years). JVMSX (1.25) is less costly to investors than PZFVX (1.16). JVMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. PZFVX (29.00). JVMSX has a lower initial minimum investment than PZFVX: JVMSX (0) vs PZFVX (1000). JVMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.58 vs. PZFVX (-31.24). JVMSX return over 5 years is better than : 30.08 vs. PZFVX (-15.41).
| JVMSX | PZFVX | JVMSX / PZFVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.15 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.16 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.197 | 8.624 | 141% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.5B | 567M | 4,321% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.40 | 2.52 | 16% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.58 | -31.24 | 18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.07 | -31.71 | -44% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.08 | -15.41 | -195% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.17 | 9.90 | 477% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers