Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMSX vs NBMRX
JVMSX vs NBMRX Comparison
Open Charts JVMSX vs NBMRX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R2
Price$29.15
Change-$0.22 (-0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.59B
Neuberger Berman M/C Intrinsic Val R6
Price$26.40
Change-$0.11 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.85M
JVMSX vs NBMRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMSX vs. NBMRX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMSX is a Buy and NBMRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMSX has more cash in the bank: 23.6B vs. NBMRX (50.8M). NBMRX pays higher dividends than JVMSX: NBMRX (0.80) vs JVMSX (0.41). JVMSX was incepted earlier than NBMRX: JVMSX (13 years) vs NBMRX (6 years). NBMRX (1.72) is less costly to investors than JVMSX (1.26). JVMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. NBMRX (29.00). JVMSX (0) and NBMRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NBMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.44 vs. JVMSX (0.34). NBMRX return over 5 years is better than : 69.16 vs. JVMSX (48.09).
| JVMSX | NBMRX | JVMSX / NBMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.75 | 167% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.72 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.728 | 0.610 | 1,431% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.6B | 50.8M | 46,457% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.41 | 0.80 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.34 | 0.44 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.96 | 5.53 | 198% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.09 | 69.16 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.60 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement