Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMSX vs LMCPX
JVMSX vs LMCPX Comparison
Open Charts JVMSX vs LMCPX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R2
Price$27.71
Change+$0.04 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.9B
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock P
Price$32.65
Change+$0.02 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.13B
JVMSX vs LMCPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMSX vs. LMCPX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMSX is a Hold and LMCPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMSX has more cash in the bank: 23.9B vs. LMCPX (1.13B). JVMSX pays higher dividends than LMCPX: JVMSX (0.40) vs LMCPX (0.35). JVMSX was incepted earlier than LMCPX: JVMSX (14 years) vs LMCPX (28 years). JVMSX (1.25) and LMCPX (1.22) have similar cost to investors . LMCPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. JVMSX (49.00). JVMSX (0) and LMCPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. JVMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.33 vs. LMCPX (0.06). JVMSX return over 5 years is better than : 22.07 vs. LMCPX (19.78).
| JVMSX | LMCPX | JVMSX / LMCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.22 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.22 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.357 | 1.084 | 310% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.9B | 1.13B | 2,115% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.40 | 0.35 | 112% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.33 | 0.06 | 3,795% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.34 | 21.81 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.07 | 19.78 | 112% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.11 | 40.69 | 116% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement