Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMSX vs LMCPX
JVMSX vs LMCPX Comparison
Open Charts JVMSX vs LMCPX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R2
Price$29.29
Change+$0.18 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.55B
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock P
Price$31.64
Change+$0.21 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.1B
JVMSX vs LMCPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMSX vs. LMCPX commentary
Aug 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMSX is a Buy and LMCPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMSX has more cash in the bank: 23.5B vs. LMCPX (1.1B). JVMSX pays higher dividends than LMCPX: JVMSX (0.41) vs LMCPX (0.37). JVMSX was incepted earlier than LMCPX: JVMSX (13 years) vs LMCPX (28 years). JVMSX (1.26) and LMCPX (1.23) have similar cost to investors . LMCPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. JVMSX (49.00). JVMSX (0) and LMCPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. JVMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.24 vs. LMCPX (-8.51). JVMSX return over 5 years is better than : 52.01 vs. LMCPX (35.03).
| JVMSX | LMCPX | JVMSX / LMCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.23 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.23 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.250 | -2.693 | -343% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.5B | 1.1B | 2,132% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.41 | 0.37 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.24 | -8.51 | 3% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.24 | 6.76 | 196% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.01 | 35.03 | 148% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.35 | 32.26 | 156% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement