Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMSX vs LMCHX
JVMSX vs LMCHX Comparison
Open Charts JVMSX vs LMCHX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R2
Price$29.93
Change+$0.44 (+1.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.32B
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock R6
Price$33.85
Change+$0.34 (+1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.13B
JVMSX vs LMCHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMSX vs. LMCHX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMSX is a Buy and LMCHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMSX has more cash in the bank: 24.3B vs. LMCHX (1.13B). LMCHX pays higher dividends than JVMSX: LMCHX (0.78) vs JVMSX (0.40). JVMSX was incepted earlier than LMCHX: JVMSX (14 years) vs LMCHX (10 years). JVMSX (1.25) is less costly to investors than LMCHX (0.67). LMCHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. JVMSX (49.00). JVMSX (0) and LMCHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. JVMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.46 vs. LMCHX (-4.21). JVMSX return over 5 years is better than : 52.77 vs. LMCHX (42.41).
| JVMSX | LMCHX | JVMSX / LMCHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.67 | 185% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.67 | 187% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.712 | 0.832 | 1,408% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.3B | 1.13B | 2,149% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.40 | 0.78 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.46 | -4.21 | -58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.90 | 20.16 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.77 | 42.41 | 124% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.59 | 46.03 | 119% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement