Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMSX vs LMCCX
JVMSX vs LMCCX Comparison
Open Charts JVMSX vs LMCCX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R2
Price$29.15
Change-$0.22 (-0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.59B
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock C
Price$29.40
Change-$0.21 (-0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.1B
JVMSX vs LMCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMSX vs. LMCCX commentary
Aug 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMSX is a Buy and LMCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMSX has more cash in the bank: 23.6B vs. LMCCX (1.1B). JVMSX pays higher dividends than LMCCX: JVMSX (0.41) vs LMCCX (0.00). JVMSX was incepted earlier than LMCCX: JVMSX (13 years) vs LMCCX (28 years). LMCCX (1.78) is less costly to investors than JVMSX (1.26). LMCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. JVMSX (49.00). JVMSX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMCCX: JVMSX (0) vs LMCCX (1000). JVMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.34 vs. LMCCX (-9.03). JVMSX return over 5 years is better than : 48.09 vs. LMCCX (26.99).
| JVMSX | LMCCX | JVMSX / LMCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.78 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.78 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.728 | -3.353 | -260% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.6B | 1.1B | 2,142% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.41 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.34 | -9.03 | -4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.96 | 2.33 | 471% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.09 | 26.99 | 178% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.60 | 18.07 | 230% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement