Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMSX vs LMCCX
JVMSX vs LMCCX Comparison
Open Charts JVMSX vs LMCCX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R2
Price$27.71
Change+$0.04 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.9B
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock C
Price$30.52
Change+$0.02 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.13B
JVMSX vs LMCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMSX vs. LMCCX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMSX is a Hold and LMCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMSX has more cash in the bank: 23.9B vs. LMCCX (1.13B). JVMSX pays higher dividends than LMCCX: JVMSX (0.40) vs LMCCX (0.00). JVMSX was incepted earlier than LMCCX: JVMSX (14 years) vs LMCCX (29 years). LMCCX (1.77) is less costly to investors than JVMSX (1.25). LMCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. JVMSX (49.00). JVMSX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMCCX: JVMSX (0) vs LMCCX (1000). JVMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.33 vs. LMCCX (-0.68). JVMSX return over 5 years is better than : 22.07 vs. LMCCX (14.77).
| JVMSX | LMCCX | JVMSX / LMCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.77 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.77 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.357 | 0.329 | 1,021% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.9B | 1.13B | 2,115% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.40 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.33 | -0.68 | -340% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.34 | 18.89 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.07 | 14.77 | 149% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.11 | 32.24 | 146% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement