Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMRX vs TMFCX
JVMRX vs TMFCX Comparison
Open Charts JVMRX vs TMFCX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R6
Price$29.59
Change+$0.13 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.85B
Touchstone Mid Cap Value C
Price$22.00
Change+$0.11 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets542.99M
JVMRX vs TMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMRX vs. TMFCX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMRX is a Hold and TMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMRX has more cash in the bank: 23.9B vs. TMFCX (543M). JVMRX pays higher dividends than TMFCX: JVMRX (0.84) vs TMFCX (0.11). JVMRX was incepted earlier than TMFCX: JVMRX (14 years) vs TMFCX (16 years). TMFCX (2.69) is less costly to investors than JVMRX (0.75). JVMRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. TMFCX (37.00). TMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMRX: TMFCX (2500) vs JVMRX (1000000). TMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.48 vs. JVMRX (-4.79). JVMRX return over 5 years is better than : 47.93 vs. TMFCX (29.64).
| JVMRX | TMFCX | JVMRX / TMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.92 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 2.69 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.837 | 3.823 | 257% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.9B | 543M | 4,401% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 0.11 | 742% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.79 | -4.48 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.62 | 9.44 | 272% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.93 | 29.64 | 162% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.40 | 36.16 | 145% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers