Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMRX vs PZVMX
JVMRX vs PZVMX Comparison
Open Charts JVMRX vs PZVMX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R6
Price$30.36
Change+$0.28 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.51B
Pzena Mid Cap Value Investor
Price$12.07
Change+$0.18 (+1.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.56M
JVMRX vs PZVMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMRX vs. PZVMX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMRX is a Buy and PZVMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMRX has more cash in the bank: 24.5B vs. PZVMX (95.6M). PZVMX pays higher dividends than JVMRX: PZVMX (1.08) vs JVMRX (0.83). JVMRX was incepted earlier than PZVMX: JVMRX (14 years) vs PZVMX (12 years). PZVMX (1.32) is less costly to investors than JVMRX (0.75). JVMRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. PZVMX (35.00). PZVMX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMRX: PZVMX (5000) vs JVMRX (1000000). JVMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.80 vs. PZVMX (-22.78). JVMRX return over 5 years is better than : 33.99 vs. PZVMX (-6.82).
| JVMRX | PZVMX | JVMRX / PZVMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.25 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.32 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.138 | -2.375 | -511% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 5000 | 20,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.5B | 95.6M | 25,628% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.83 | 1.08 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.80 | -22.78 | 25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.73 | -22.81 | -65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.99 | -6.82 | -498% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.15 | 21.41 | 239% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement