Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMRX vs NMVZX
JVMRX vs NMVZX Comparison
Open Charts JVMRX vs NMVZX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R6
Price$28.89
Change-$0.82 (-2.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.73B
Nuance Mid Cap Value Z
Price$13.31
Change+$0.98 (+7.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets392.06M
JVMRX vs NMVZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMRX vs. NMVZX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMRX is a Buy and NMVZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMRX has more cash in the bank: 24.7B vs. NMVZX (392M). NMVZX pays higher dividends than JVMRX: NMVZX (2.94) vs JVMRX (0.82). JVMRX was incepted earlier than NMVZX: JVMRX (14 years) vs NMVZX (9 years). NMVZX (0.86) is less costly to investors than JVMRX (0.75). NMVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. JVMRX (49.00). NMVZX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMRX: NMVZX (2500) vs JVMRX (1000000). NMVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.22 vs. JVMRX (5.07). JVMRX return over 5 years is better than : 23.56 vs. NMVZX (1.01).
| JVMRX | NMVZX | JVMRX / NMVZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.81 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.86 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.208 | 6.480 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.7B | 392M | 6,301% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 2.94 | 28% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.07 | 8.22 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.07 | 11.86 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.56 | 1.01 | 2,323% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.03 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement