Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMRX vs NMVZX
JVMRX vs NMVZX Comparison
Open Charts JVMRX vs NMVZX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R6
Price$29.59
Change+$0.13 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.85B
Nuance Mid Cap Value Z
Price$12.44
Change+$0.09 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets435.34M
JVMRX vs NMVZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMRX vs. NMVZX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMRX is a Hold and NMVZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMRX has more cash in the bank: 23.9B vs. NMVZX (435M). NMVZX pays higher dividends than JVMRX: NMVZX (2.69) vs JVMRX (0.84). JVMRX was incepted earlier than NMVZX: JVMRX (14 years) vs NMVZX (8 years). NMVZX (0.86) is less costly to investors than JVMRX (0.75). NMVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. JVMRX (49.00). NMVZX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMRX: NMVZX (2500) vs JVMRX (1000000). JVMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.79 vs. NMVZX (-5.58). JVMRX return over 5 years is better than : 47.93 vs. NMVZX (5.95).
| JVMRX | NMVZX | JVMRX / NMVZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.81 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.86 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.837 | 3.083 | 319% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.9B | 435M | 5,494% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 2.69 | 31% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.79 | -5.58 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.62 | 10.30 | 249% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.93 | 5.95 | 806% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.40 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers