Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMRX vs NCBVX
JVMRX vs NCBVX Comparison
Open Charts JVMRX vs NCBVX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R6
Price$29.23
Change+$0.19 (+0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.61B
PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Val C
Price$20.93
Change+$0.14 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets165.36M
JVMRX vs NCBVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMRX vs. NCBVX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMRX is a StrongBuy and NCBVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMRX has more cash in the bank: 22.6B vs. NCBVX (165M). NCBVX pays higher dividends than JVMRX: NCBVX (1.01) vs JVMRX (0.88). JVMRX was incepted earlier than NCBVX: JVMRX (14 years) vs NCBVX (27 years). NCBVX (2.81) is less costly to investors than JVMRX (0.76). NCBVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. JVMRX (47.00). NCBVX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMRX: NCBVX (1000) vs JVMRX (1000000). NCBVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.49 vs. JVMRX (3.59). NCBVX return over 5 years is better than : 101.98 vs. JVMRX (63.32).
| JVMRX | NCBVX | JVMRX / NCBVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.95 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 2.81 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.500 | 4.650 | 183% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.6B | 165M | 13,697% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 1.01 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.59 | 12.49 | 29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.14 | 28.49 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.32 | 101.98 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.30 | 25.69 | 192% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers