Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMRX vs NBRAX
JVMRX vs NBRAX Comparison
Open Charts JVMRX vs NBRAX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R6
Price$28.89
Change-$0.82 (-2.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.73B
Neuberger M/C Intrinsic Val A
Price$27.43
Change-$0.98 (-3.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.72M
JVMRX vs NBRAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMRX vs. NBRAX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMRX is a Buy and NBRAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMRX has more cash in the bank: 24.7B vs. NBRAX (50.7M). JVMRX pays higher dividends than NBRAX: JVMRX (0.82) vs NBRAX (0.54). JVMRX was incepted earlier than NBRAX: JVMRX (14 years) vs NBRAX (16 years). NBRAX (1.82) is less costly to investors than JVMRX (0.75). JVMRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. NBRAX (16.00). NBRAX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMRX: NBRAX (1000) vs JVMRX (1000000). JVMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.07 vs. NBRAX (3.69). NBRAX return over 5 years is better than : 29.90 vs. JVMRX (23.56).
| JVMRX | NBRAX | JVMRX / NBRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.21 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.82 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.208 | 4.416 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.7B | 50.7M | 48,718% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.54 | 153% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.07 | 3.69 | 137% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.07 | 9.36 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.56 | 29.90 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.03 | 71.15 | 112% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement