Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMRX vs NBRAX
JVMRX vs NBRAX Comparison
Open Charts JVMRX vs NBRAX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R6
Price$29.61
Change-$0.39 (-1.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.25B
Neuberger Berman M/C Intrinsic Val A
Price$28.07
Change-$0.46 (-1.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.97M
JVMRX vs NBRAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMRX vs. NBRAX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMRX is a Hold and NBRAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMRX has more cash in the bank: 24.2B vs. NBRAX (51M). JVMRX pays higher dividends than NBRAX: JVMRX (0.85) vs NBRAX (0.35). JVMRX was incepted earlier than NBRAX: JVMRX (14 years) vs NBRAX (15 years). NBRAX (1.78) is less costly to investors than JVMRX (0.75). JVMRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. NBRAX (29.00). NBRAX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMRX: NBRAX (1000) vs JVMRX (1000000). NBRAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.75 vs. JVMRX (-6.40). NBRAX return over 5 years is better than : 61.66 vs. JVMRX (36.83).
| JVMRX | NBRAX | JVMRX / NBRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.21 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.78 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.911 | 8.520 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.2B | 51M | 47,451% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 0.35 | 242% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.40 | -0.75 | 854% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.51 | 16.85 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.83 | 61.66 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.46 | 38.07 | 135% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement