Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMRX vs NBRAX
JVMRX vs NBRAX Comparison
Open Charts JVMRX vs NBRAX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R6
Price$29.59
Change+$0.13 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.85B
Neuberger Berman M/C Intrinsic Val A
Price$27.95
Change+$0.04 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.88M
JVMRX vs NBRAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMRX vs. NBRAX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMRX is a Hold and NBRAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMRX has more cash in the bank: 23.9B vs. NBRAX (50.9M). JVMRX pays higher dividends than NBRAX: JVMRX (0.84) vs NBRAX (0.35). JVMRX was incepted earlier than NBRAX: JVMRX (14 years) vs NBRAX (15 years). NBRAX (1.78) is less costly to investors than JVMRX (0.75). JVMRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. NBRAX (29.00). NBRAX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMRX: NBRAX (1000) vs JVMRX (1000000). NBRAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.42 vs. JVMRX (-4.79). NBRAX return over 5 years is better than : 73.55 vs. JVMRX (47.93).
| JVMRX | NBRAX | JVMRX / NBRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.21 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.78 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.837 | 6.314 | 156% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.9B | 50.9M | 46,955% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 0.35 | 238% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.79 | -0.42 | 1,141% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.62 | 24.38 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.93 | 73.55 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.40 | 30.18 | 174% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement