Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMRX vs NBMRX
JVMRX vs NBMRX Comparison
Open Charts JVMRX vs NBMRX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R6
Price$29.59
Change+$0.13 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.85B
Neuberger Berman M/C Intrinsic Val R6
Price$27.99
Change+$0.03 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.83M
JVMRX vs NBMRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMRX vs. NBMRX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMRX is a Hold and NBMRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMRX has more cash in the bank: 23.9B vs. NBMRX (50.8M). JVMRX pays higher dividends than NBMRX: JVMRX (0.84) vs NBMRX (0.75). JVMRX was incepted earlier than NBMRX: JVMRX (14 years) vs NBMRX (7 years). NBMRX (1.72) is less costly to investors than JVMRX (0.75). JVMRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. NBMRX (29.00). NBMRX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMRX: NBMRX (0) vs JVMRX (1000000). NBMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.00 vs. JVMRX (-4.79). NBMRX return over 5 years is better than : 78.46 vs. JVMRX (47.93).
| JVMRX | NBMRX | JVMRX / NBMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.75 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.72 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.837 | 6.669 | 147% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.9B | 50.8M | 47,047% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 0.75 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.79 | -0.00 | 111,636% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.62 | 26.74 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.93 | 78.46 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.40 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement