Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMRX vs NBMRX
JVMRX vs NBMRX Comparison
Open Charts JVMRX vs NBMRX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R6
Price$30.08
Change-$0.13 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.39B
Neuberger Berman M/C Intrinsic Val R6
Price$28.67
Change+$0.02 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.62M
JVMRX vs NBMRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMRX vs. NBMRX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMRX is a Buy and NBMRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMRX has more cash in the bank: 24.4B vs. NBMRX (50.6M). JVMRX pays higher dividends than NBMRX: JVMRX (0.83) vs NBMRX (0.74). JVMRX was incepted earlier than NBMRX: JVMRX (14 years) vs NBMRX (7 years). NBMRX (1.72) is less costly to investors than JVMRX (0.75). JVMRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. NBMRX (29.00). NBMRX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMRX: NBMRX (0) vs JVMRX (1000000). NBMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.76 vs. JVMRX (-5.80). NBMRX return over 5 years is better than : 56.95 vs. JVMRX (33.99).
| JVMRX | NBMRX | JVMRX / NBMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.75 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.72 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.138 | 9.184 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.4B | 50.6M | 48,221% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.83 | 0.74 | 112% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.80 | -1.76 | 330% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.73 | 18.54 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.99 | 56.95 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.15 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement