Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMRX vs NBMRX
JVMRX vs NBMRX Comparison
Open Charts JVMRX vs NBMRX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R6
Price$29.46
Change+$0.18 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.06B
Neuberger Berman M/C Intrinsic Val R6
Price$26.94
Change+$0.16 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets52.08M
JVMRX vs NBMRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMRX vs. NBMRX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMRX is a StrongBuy and NBMRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMRX has more cash in the bank: 23.1B vs. NBMRX (52.1M). JVMRX pays higher dividends than NBMRX: JVMRX (0.88) vs NBMRX (0.82). JVMRX was incepted earlier than NBMRX: JVMRX (14 years) vs NBMRX (6 years). NBMRX (1.72) is less costly to investors than JVMRX (0.76). JVMRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. NBMRX (29.00). NBMRX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMRX: NBMRX (0) vs JVMRX (1000000). JVMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.28 vs. NBMRX (0.97). NBMRX return over 5 years is better than : 82.17 vs. JVMRX (58.56).
| JVMRX | NBMRX | JVMRX / NBMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.75 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.72 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.354 | 2.668 | 351% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.1B | 52.1M | 44,338% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 0.82 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.28 | 0.97 | 132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.72 | 18.74 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.56 | 82.17 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.14 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement