Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMRX vs LMCSX
JVMRX vs LMCSX Comparison
Open Charts JVMRX vs LMCSX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R6
Price$30.36
Change+$0.28 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.51B
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock R4
Price$34.81
Change+$0.43 (+1.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.13B
JVMRX vs LMCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMRX vs. LMCSX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMRX is a Buy and LMCSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMRX has more cash in the bank: 24.5B vs. LMCSX (1.13B). JVMRX pays higher dividends than LMCSX: JVMRX (0.83) vs LMCSX (0.52). JVMRX was incepted earlier than LMCSX: JVMRX (14 years) vs LMCSX (10 years). LMCSX (1.02) is less costly to investors than JVMRX (0.75). LMCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. JVMRX (49.00). LMCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMRX: LMCSX (0) vs JVMRX (1000000). JVMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.80 vs. LMCSX (-11.62). JVMRX return over 5 years is better than : 33.99 vs. LMCSX (24.59).
| JVMRX | LMCSX | JVMRX / LMCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.02 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.02 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.138 | 2.616 | 464% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.5B | 1.13B | 2,166% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.83 | 0.52 | 159% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.80 | -11.62 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.73 | 12.34 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.99 | 24.59 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.15 | 41.99 | 122% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement