Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMRX vs LMCSX
JVMRX vs LMCSX Comparison
Open Charts JVMRX vs LMCSX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R6
Price$29.61
Change-$0.39 (-1.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.25B
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock R4
Price$34.14
Change-$0.40 (-1.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.13B
JVMRX vs LMCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMRX vs. LMCSX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMRX is a Hold and LMCSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMRX has more cash in the bank: 24.2B vs. LMCSX (1.13B). JVMRX pays higher dividends than LMCSX: JVMRX (0.85) vs LMCSX (0.54). JVMRX was incepted earlier than LMCSX: JVMRX (14 years) vs LMCSX (10 years). LMCSX (1.02) is less costly to investors than JVMRX (0.75). LMCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. JVMRX (49.00). LMCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMRX: LMCSX (0) vs JVMRX (1000000). JVMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.34 vs. LMCSX (-10.75). JVMRX return over 5 years is better than : 38.63 vs. LMCSX (29.96).
| JVMRX | LMCSX | JVMRX / LMCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.02 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.02 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.359 | 2.675 | 425% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.2B | 1.13B | 2,143% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 0.54 | 158% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.34 | -10.75 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.57 | 15.31 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.63 | 29.96 | 129% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.27 | 47.18 | 117% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement