Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMRX vs LMCSX
JVMRX vs LMCSX Comparison
Open Charts JVMRX vs LMCSX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R6
Price$28.79
Change+$0.15 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.68B
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock R4
Price$34.62
Change+$0.07 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.14B
JVMRX vs LMCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMRX vs. LMCSX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMRX is a Hold and LMCSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMRX has more cash in the bank: 24.7B vs. LMCSX (1.14B). JVMRX pays higher dividends than LMCSX: JVMRX (0.85) vs LMCSX (0.44). JVMRX was incepted earlier than LMCSX: JVMRX (14 years) vs LMCSX (11 years). LMCSX (1.02) is less costly to investors than JVMRX (0.75). LMCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. JVMRX (49.00). LMCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMRX: LMCSX (0) vs JVMRX (1000000). JVMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.31 vs. LMCSX (1.93). JVMRX return over 5 years is better than : 22.57 vs. LMCSX (18.38).
| JVMRX | LMCSX | JVMRX / LMCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.02 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.02 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.843 | 2.913 | 166% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.7B | 1.14B | 2,169% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 0.44 | 194% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.31 | 1.93 | 327% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.11 | 19.28 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.57 | 18.38 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.30 | 63.43 | 120% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement