Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMRX vs LMCRX
JVMRX vs LMCRX Comparison
Open Charts JVMRX vs LMCRX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R6
Price$29.52
Change+$0.18 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.55B
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock R3
Price$32.45
Change+$0.01 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.1B
JVMRX vs LMCRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMRX vs. LMCRX commentary
Aug 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMRX is a Buy and LMCRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMRX has more cash in the bank: 23.5B vs. LMCRX (1.1B). JVMRX pays higher dividends than LMCRX: JVMRX (0.86) vs LMCRX (0.31). JVMRX was incepted earlier than LMCRX: JVMRX (14 years) vs LMCRX (17 years). LMCRX (1.28) is less costly to investors than JVMRX (0.76). LMCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. JVMRX (49.00). LMCRX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMRX: LMCRX (0) vs JVMRX (1000000). JVMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.32 vs. LMCRX (-7.64). JVMRX return over 5 years is better than : 54.59 vs. LMCRX (34.67).
| JVMRX | LMCRX | JVMRX / LMCRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.28 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.28 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.577 | -2.611 | -367% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.5B | 1.1B | 2,132% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.86 | 0.31 | 278% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.32 | -7.64 | -4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.46 | 7.18 | 201% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.59 | 34.67 | 157% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.15 | 33.41 | 165% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement