Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMRX vs LMCQX
JVMRX vs LMCQX Comparison
Open Charts JVMRX vs LMCQX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R6
Price$29.46
Change+$0.18 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.06B
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock R2
Price$33.70
Change+$0.29 (+0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.12B
JVMRX vs LMCQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMRX vs. LMCQX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMRX is a StrongBuy and LMCQX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMRX has more cash in the bank: 23.1B vs. LMCQX (1.13B). JVMRX pays higher dividends than LMCQX: JVMRX (0.88) vs LMCQX (0.24). JVMRX was incepted earlier than LMCQX: JVMRX (14 years) vs LMCQX (17 years). LMCQX (1.38) is less costly to investors than JVMRX (0.76). LMCQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. JVMRX (49.00). LMCQX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMRX: LMCQX (0) vs JVMRX (1000000). JVMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.28 vs. LMCQX (-2.63). JVMRX return over 5 years is better than : 58.56 vs. LMCQX (41.16).
| JVMRX | LMCQX | JVMRX / LMCQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.38 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.38 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.354 | 1.967 | 476% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.1B | 1.13B | 2,053% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 0.24 | 360% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.28 | -2.63 | -49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.72 | 18.30 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.56 | 41.16 | 142% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.14 | 34.20 | 150% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement