Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMRX vs LMCHX
JVMRX vs LMCHX Comparison
Open Charts JVMRX vs LMCHX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R6
Price$27.90
Change+$0.04 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.95B
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock R6
Price$34.16
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.13B
JVMRX vs LMCHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMRX vs. LMCHX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMRX is a Hold and LMCHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMRX has more cash in the bank: 23.9B vs. LMCHX (1.13B). JVMRX pays higher dividends than LMCHX: JVMRX (0.83) vs LMCHX (0.76). JVMRX was incepted earlier than LMCHX: JVMRX (14 years) vs LMCHX (11 years). JVMRX (0.75) is less costly to investors than LMCHX (0.67). LMCHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. JVMRX (49.00). LMCHX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMRX: LMCHX (0) vs JVMRX (1000000). JVMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.35 vs. LMCHX (0.18). JVMRX (24.33) and LMCHX (23.96) have equivalent 5 years return.
| JVMRX | LMCHX | JVMRX / LMCHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.67 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.67 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.563 | 1.455 | 245% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.9B | 1.13B | 2,117% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.83 | 0.76 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.35 | 0.18 | 1,334% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.55 | 23.60 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.33 | 23.96 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.02 | 47.46 | 107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement