Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMRX vs LMCFX
JVMRX vs LMCFX Comparison
Open Charts JVMRX vs LMCFX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R6
Price$29.35
Change-$0.11 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.06B
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock F
Price$33.98
Change-$0.15 (-0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.12B
JVMRX vs LMCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMRX vs. LMCFX commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMRX is a StrongBuy and LMCFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMRX has more cash in the bank: 23.1B vs. LMCFX (1.13B). JVMRX pays higher dividends than LMCFX: JVMRX (0.88) vs LMCFX (0.75). JVMRX was incepted earlier than LMCFX: JVMRX (14 years) vs LMCFX (18 years). LMCFX (0.88) is less costly to investors than JVMRX (0.76). LMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. JVMRX (49.00). LMCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMRX: LMCFX (0) vs JVMRX (1000000). JVMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.28 vs. LMCFX (-2.07). JVMRX return over 5 years is better than : 58.56 vs. LMCFX (44.32).
| JVMRX | LMCFX | JVMRX / LMCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.88 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.88 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.354 | 2.247 | 416% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.1B | 1.13B | 2,053% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 0.75 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.28 | -2.07 | -62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.72 | 20.29 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.56 | 44.32 | 132% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.14 | 39.60 | 129% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers