Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs TGVNX
JVMCX vs TGVNX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs TGVNX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$28.06
Change+$0.28 (+1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.25B
TCW Relative Value Mid Cap N
Price$29.97
Change+$0.31 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets101.4M
JVMCX vs TGVNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. TGVNX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a Hold and TGVNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 24.2B vs. TGVNX (101M). TGVNX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: TGVNX (0.86) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than TGVNX: JVMCX (14 years) vs TGVNX (25 years). JVMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than TGVNX (1.39). JVMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. TGVNX (38.54). JVMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TGVNX: JVMCX (1000) vs TGVNX (2000). TGVNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.63 vs. JVMCX (-2.54). TGVNX return over 5 years is better than : 75.74 vs. JVMCX (54.71).
| JVMCX | TGVNX | JVMCX / TGVNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 0.95 | 195% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.39 | 134% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.909 | 9.901 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.2B | 101M | 23,960% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.86 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.54 | 1.63 | -155% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.96 | 49.85 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.71 | 75.74 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.96 | 52.49 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers