Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs TGVNX
JVMCX vs TGVNX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs TGVNX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$28.15
Change+$0.02 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.32B
TCW Relative Value Mid Cap N
Price$30.04
Change-$0.06 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets102.04M
JVMCX vs TGVNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. TGVNX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a Buy and TGVNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 24.3B vs. TGVNX (102M). TGVNX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: TGVNX (0.86) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than TGVNX: JVMCX (14 years) vs TGVNX (25 years). JVMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than TGVNX (1.39). JVMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. TGVNX (38.54). JVMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TGVNX: JVMCX (1000) vs TGVNX (2000). TGVNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.94 vs. JVMCX (1.22). TGVNX return over 5 years is better than : 69.19 vs. JVMCX (48.03).
| JVMCX | TGVNX | JVMCX / TGVNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 0.95 | 195% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.39 | 134% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.265 | 10.158 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.3B | 102M | 23,824% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.86 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.22 | 6.94 | 18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.25 | 38.60 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.03 | 69.19 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.05 | 41.75 | 108% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers