Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs PZVMX
JVMCX vs PZVMX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs PZVMX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$27.30
Change+$0.17 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.61B
Pzena Mid Cap Value Investor
Price$12.56
Change+$0.05 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.25M
JVMCX vs PZVMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. PZVMX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a StrongBuy and PZVMX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 22.6B vs. PZVMX (109M). PZVMX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: PZVMX (1.06) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than PZVMX: JVMCX (14 years) vs PZVMX (11 years). JVMCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than PZVMX (1.34). JVMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. PZVMX (39.00). JVMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PZVMX: JVMCX (1000) vs PZVMX (5000). JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.79 vs. PZVMX (-10.98). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 55.49 vs. PZVMX (39.86).
| JVMCX | PZVMX | JVMCX / PZVMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.25 | 150% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 1.34 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.905 | 2.867 | 276% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 5000 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.6B | 109M | 20,734% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.06 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.79 | -10.98 | -16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.12 | -9.73 | -207% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.49 | 39.86 | 139% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.64 | 27.31 | 131% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement