Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs PZVMX
JVMCX vs PZVMX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs PZVMX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$28.06
Change+$0.28 (+1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.25B
Pzena Mid Cap Value Investor
Price$12.34
Change+$0.08 (+0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.03M
JVMCX vs PZVMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. PZVMX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a Hold and PZVMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 24.2B vs. PZVMX (100M). PZVMX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: PZVMX (1.01) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than PZVMX: JVMCX (14 years) vs PZVMX (12 years). JVMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than PZVMX (1.32). JVMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. PZVMX (35.00). JVMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PZVMX: JVMCX (1000) vs PZVMX (5000). JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.54 vs. PZVMX (-18.33). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 54.71 vs. PZVMX (32.30).
| JVMCX | PZVMX | JVMCX / PZVMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 1.25 | 148% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.32 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.909 | 1.065 | 1,025% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 5000 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.2B | 100M | 24,200% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.01 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.54 | -18.33 | 14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.96 | -2.75 | -1,127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.71 | 32.30 | 169% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.96 | 39.94 | 128% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers