Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs PZIMX
JVMCX vs PZIMX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs PZIMX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$27.50
Change+$0.17 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.06B
Pzena Mid Cap Value Instl
Price$12.20
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets107.88M
JVMCX vs PZIMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. PZIMX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a StrongBuy and PZIMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 23.1B vs. PZIMX (108M). PZIMX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: PZIMX (1.46) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than PZIMX: JVMCX (14 years) vs PZIMX (11 years). JVMCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than PZIMX (0.97). JVMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. PZIMX (35.00). JVMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PZIMX: JVMCX (1000) vs PZIMX (1000000). JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.47 vs. PZIMX (-15.91). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 50.96 vs. PZIMX (30.89).
| JVMCX | PZIMX | JVMCX / PZIMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.90 | 208% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 0.97 | 194% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.696 | 1.836 | 474% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.1B | 108M | 21,389% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.47 | -15.91 | 3% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.84 | -11.64 | -153% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.96 | 30.89 | 165% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.38 | 30.15 | 124% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers