Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs PZIMX
JVMCX vs PZIMX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs PZIMX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$28.06
Change+$0.28 (+1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.25B
Pzena Mid Cap Value Instl
Price$12.07
Change-$0.20 (-1.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets101.04M
JVMCX vs PZIMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. PZIMX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a Hold and PZIMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 24.2B vs. PZIMX (101M). PZIMX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: PZIMX (1.38) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than PZIMX: JVMCX (14 years) vs PZIMX (12 years). JVMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than PZIMX (0.97). JVMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. PZIMX (35.00). JVMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PZIMX: JVMCX (1000) vs PZIMX (1000000). JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.54 vs. PZIMX (-17.39). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 54.71 vs. PZIMX (34.66).
| JVMCX | PZIMX | JVMCX / PZIMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 0.90 | 206% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 0.97 | 192% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.909 | 2.421 | 451% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.2B | 101M | 23,960% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.38 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.54 | -17.39 | 15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.96 | -1.71 | -1,813% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.71 | 34.66 | 158% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.96 | 44.03 | 116% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement