Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs PZIMX
JVMCX vs PZIMX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs PZIMX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$26.89
Change-$0.78 (-2.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.66B
Pzena Mid Cap Value Instl
Price$11.88
Change-$0.09 (-0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.14M
JVMCX vs PZIMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. PZIMX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a Buy and PZIMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 24.7B vs. PZIMX (97.1M). PZIMX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: PZIMX (0.22) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than PZIMX: JVMCX (14 years) vs PZIMX (12 years). JVMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than PZIMX (0.97). JVMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. PZIMX (35.00). JVMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PZIMX: JVMCX (1000) vs PZIMX (1000000). JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.34 vs. PZIMX (-2.17). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 15.97 vs. PZIMX (-11.73).
| JVMCX | PZIMX | JVMCX / PZIMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 0.90 | 206% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 0.97 | 192% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.121 | 4.394 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.7B | 97.1M | 25,438% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.22 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.34 | -2.17 | -154% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.94 | -15.73 | -44% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.97 | -11.73 | -136% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.82 | 51.35 | 120% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement