Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs PZIMX
JVMCX vs PZIMX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs PZIMX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$28.23
Change+$0.26 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.51B
Pzena Mid Cap Value Instl
Price$11.89
Change+$0.18 (+1.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.56M
JVMCX vs PZIMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. PZIMX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a Buy and PZIMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 24.5B vs. PZIMX (95.6M). PZIMX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: PZIMX (1.47) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than PZIMX: JVMCX (14 years) vs PZIMX (12 years). JVMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than PZIMX (0.97). JVMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. PZIMX (35.00). JVMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PZIMX: JVMCX (1000) vs PZIMX (1000000). JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.71 vs. PZIMX (-21.46). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 25.99 vs. PZIMX (-7.58).
| JVMCX | PZIMX | JVMCX / PZIMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 0.90 | 206% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 0.97 | 192% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.581 | -0.751 | -1,542% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.5B | 95.6M | 25,628% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.47 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.71 | -21.46 | 31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.60 | -21.76 | -53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.99 | -7.58 | -343% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.07 | 25.24 | 151% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement