Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs PZIMX
JVMCX vs PZIMX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs PZIMX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$26.00
Change+$0.04 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.95B
Pzena Mid Cap Value Instl
Price$11.59
Change+$0.03 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets94.62M
JVMCX vs PZIMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. PZIMX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a Hold and PZIMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 23.9B vs. PZIMX (94.6M). PZIMX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: PZIMX (1.47) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than PZIMX: JVMCX (14 years) vs PZIMX (12 years). JVMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than PZIMX (0.97). JVMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. PZIMX (35.00). JVMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PZIMX: JVMCX (1000) vs PZIMX (1000000). JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.52 vs. PZIMX (-4.29). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 17.72 vs. PZIMX (-7.38).
| JVMCX | PZIMX | JVMCX / PZIMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 0.90 | 206% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 0.97 | 192% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.767 | -3.255 | -85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.9B | 94.6M | 25,264% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.47 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.52 | -4.29 | -35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.13 | -6.66 | -182% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.72 | -7.38 | -240% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.94 | 31.09 | 119% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement