Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs PZIMX
JVMCX vs PZIMX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs PZIMX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$27.30
Change+$0.17 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.61B
Pzena Mid Cap Value Instl
Price$12.35
Change+$0.05 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.25M
JVMCX vs PZIMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. PZIMX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a StrongBuy and PZIMX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 22.6B vs. PZIMX (109M). PZIMX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: PZIMX (1.46) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than PZIMX: JVMCX (14 years) vs PZIMX (11 years). JVMCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than PZIMX (0.99). JVMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. PZIMX (39.00). JVMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PZIMX: JVMCX (1000) vs PZIMX (1000000). JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.79 vs. PZIMX (-10.88). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 55.49 vs. PZIMX (40.83).
| JVMCX | PZIMX | JVMCX / PZIMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.90 | 208% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 0.99 | 190% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.905 | 3.088 | 256% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.6B | 109M | 20,734% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.79 | -10.88 | -16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.12 | -9.59 | -210% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.49 | 40.83 | 136% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.64 | 29.59 | 120% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement