Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs PZFVX
JVMCX vs PZFVX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs PZFVX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$26.89
Change-$0.78 (-2.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.66B
JHancock Classic Value A
Price$19.34
Change-$5.76 (-22.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets518.96M
JVMCX vs PZFVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. PZFVX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a Buy and PZFVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 24.7B vs. PZFVX (519M). PZFVX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: PZFVX (1.86) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than PZFVX: JVMCX (14 years) vs PZFVX (30 years). JVMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than PZFVX (1.16). JVMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. PZFVX (29.00). JVMCX (1000) and PZFVX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.34 vs. PZFVX (-20.44). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 15.97 vs. PZFVX (-37.24).
| JVMCX | PZFVX | JVMCX / PZFVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 1.15 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.16 | 160% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.121 | -0.206 | -2,481% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.7B | 519M | 4,759% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.86 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.34 | -20.44 | -16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.94 | -41.50 | -17% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.97 | -37.24 | -43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.82 | -0.49 | -12,576% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement