Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs PZFVX
JVMCX vs PZFVX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs PZFVX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$26.00
Change+$0.04 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.95B
JHancock Classic Value A
Price$19.69
Change+$0.03 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets559.13M
JVMCX vs PZFVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. PZFVX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a Hold and PZFVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 23.9B vs. PZFVX (559M). PZFVX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: PZFVX (2.52) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than PZFVX: JVMCX (14 years) vs PZFVX (30 years). JVMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than PZFVX (1.16). JVMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. PZFVX (29.00). JVMCX (1000) and PZFVX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.52 vs. PZFVX (-17.37). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 17.72 vs. PZFVX (-33.35).
| JVMCX | PZFVX | JVMCX / PZFVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 1.15 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.16 | 160% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.767 | -16.355 | -17% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.9B | 559M | 4,275% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 2.52 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.52 | -17.37 | -9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.13 | -33.75 | -36% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.72 | -33.35 | -53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.94 | -12.17 | -304% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers