Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs PCMSX
JVMCX vs PCMSX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs PCMSX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$27.37
Change-$0.04 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.59B
Principal MidCap Value I R6
Price$16.11
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.31B
JVMCX vs PCMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. PCMSX commentary
Aug 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a Buy and PCMSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 23.6B vs. PCMSX (2.31B). PCMSX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: PCMSX (1.37) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than PCMSX: JVMCX (14 years) vs PCMSX (6 years). JVMCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than PCMSX (0.65). PCMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.30 vs. JVMCX (49.00). PCMSX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMCX: PCMSX (0) vs JVMCX (1000). JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.23 vs. PCMSX (-9.43). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 45.07 vs. PCMSX (31.93).
| JVMCX | PCMSX | JVMCX / PCMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.63 | 297% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 0.65 | 289% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.182 | 3.402 | 241% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.6B | 2.31B | 1,021% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.37 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.23 | -9.43 | 13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.16 | -2.37 | -429% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.07 | 31.93 | 141% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.17 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers