Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs NMAVX
JVMCX vs NMAVX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs NMAVX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$26.89
Change-$0.78 (-2.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.66B
Nuance Mid Cap Value Investor
Price$13.25
Change+$0.97 (+7.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets390.87M
JVMCX vs NMAVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. NMAVX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a Buy and NMAVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 24.7B vs. NMAVX (391M). NMAVX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: NMAVX (2.56) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than NMAVX: JVMCX (14 years) vs NMAVX (12 years). JVMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than NMAVX (1.26). NMAVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. JVMCX (49.00). JVMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMAVX: JVMCX (1000) vs NMAVX (2500). NMAVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.80 vs. JVMCX (3.34). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 15.97 vs. NMAVX (-0.62).
| JVMCX | NMAVX | JVMCX / NMAVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 1.21 | 153% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.26 | 148% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.121 | 6.511 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.7B | 391M | 6,317% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 2.56 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.34 | 7.80 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.94 | 10.55 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.97 | -0.62 | -2,565% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.82 | 55.52 | 111% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers