Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs NMAVX
JVMCX vs NMAVX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs NMAVX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$26.00
Change+$0.04 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.95B
Nuance Mid Cap Value Investor
Price$12.47
Change-$0.01 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets390.19M
JVMCX vs NMAVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. NMAVX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a Hold and NMAVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 23.9B vs. NMAVX (390M). NMAVX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: NMAVX (2.27) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than NMAVX: JVMCX (14 years) vs NMAVX (12 years). JVMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than NMAVX (1.26). NMAVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. JVMCX (49.00). JVMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMAVX: JVMCX (1000) vs NMAVX (2500). NMAVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.52 vs. JVMCX (1.52). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 17.72 vs. NMAVX (-3.90).
| JVMCX | NMAVX | JVMCX / NMAVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 1.21 | 153% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.26 | 148% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.767 | 3.434 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.9B | 390M | 6,128% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 2.27 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.52 | 2.52 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.13 | 9.09 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.72 | -3.90 | -454% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.94 | 38.39 | 96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers