Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs NBRVX
JVMCX vs NBRVX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs NBRVX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$25.82
Change-$0.30 (-1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.46B
Neuberger Berman M/C Intrinsic Val I
Price$24.94
Change-$0.43 (-1.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.31M
JVMCX vs NBRVX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. NBRVX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a StrongBuy and NBRVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 21.5B vs. NBRVX (49.3M). NBRVX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: NBRVX (0.65) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than NBRVX: JVMCX (14 years) vs NBRVX (26 years). JVMCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than NBRVX (1.53). JVMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. NBRVX (29.00). JVMCX (1000) and NBRVX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.05 vs. NBRVX (-5.08). NBRVX return over 5 years is better than : 65.31 vs. JVMCX (45.41).
| JVMCX | NBRVX | JVMCX / NBRVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.50 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 1.53 | 123% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.055 | -5.135 | -40% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.5B | 49.3M | 43,611% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.65 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.05 | -5.08 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.31 | 11.03 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.41 | 65.31 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.18 | 12.24 | 206% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers