Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs NBRVX
JVMCX vs NBRVX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs NBRVX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$27.55
Change+$0.12 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.85B
Neuberger Berman M/C Intrinsic Val I
Price$28.00
Change+$0.03 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.83M
JVMCX vs NBRVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. NBRVX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a Hold and NBRVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 23.9B vs. NBRVX (50.8M). NBRVX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: NBRVX (0.57) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than NBRVX: JVMCX (14 years) vs NBRVX (26 years). JVMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than NBRVX (1.53). JVMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. NBRVX (29.00). JVMCX (1000) and NBRVX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NBRVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.22 vs. JVMCX (-6.45). NBRVX return over 5 years is better than : 75.10 vs. JVMCX (40.87).
| JVMCX | NBRVX | JVMCX / NBRVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 1.50 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.53 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.893 | 6.504 | 137% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.9B | 50.8M | 47,047% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.57 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.45 | -0.22 | 2,874% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.60 | 24.88 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.87 | 75.10 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.46 | 37.14 | 104% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers