Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs NBRVX
JVMCX vs NBRVX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs NBRVX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$28.15
Change+$0.02 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.32B
Neuberger Berman M/C Intrinsic Val I
Price$27.77
Change+$0.11 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets52.59M
JVMCX vs NBRVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. NBRVX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a Buy and NBRVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 24.3B vs. NBRVX (52.6M). NBRVX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: NBRVX (0.59) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than NBRVX: JVMCX (14 years) vs NBRVX (26 years). JVMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than NBRVX (1.53). JVMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. NBRVX (29.00). JVMCX (1000) and NBRVX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NBRVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.94 vs. JVMCX (1.22). NBRVX return over 5 years is better than : 77.14 vs. JVMCX (48.03).
| JVMCX | NBRVX | JVMCX / NBRVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 1.50 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.53 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.265 | 5.630 | 200% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.3B | 52.6M | 46,198% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.59 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.22 | 5.94 | 21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.25 | 21.18 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.03 | 77.14 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.05 | 37.51 | 120% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement