Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs NBRRX
JVMCX vs NBRRX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs NBRRX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$27.50
Change+$0.17 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.06B
Neuberger Berman M/C Intrinsic Val R3
Price$26.85
Change+$0.16 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets52.08M
JVMCX vs NBRRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. NBRRX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a StrongBuy and NBRRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 23.1B vs. NBRRX (52.1M). NBRRX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: NBRRX (0.21) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than NBRRX: JVMCX (14 years) vs NBRRX (15 years). NBRRX (2.06) is less costly to investors than JVMCX (1.88). JVMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. NBRRX (29.00). NBRRX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMCX: NBRRX (0) vs JVMCX (1000). NBRRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.27 vs. JVMCX (-0.47). NBRRX return over 5 years is better than : 75.20 vs. JVMCX (50.96).
| JVMCX | NBRRX | JVMCX / NBRRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.46 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 2.06 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.696 | 2.286 | 380% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.1B | 52.1M | 44,338% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.21 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.47 | 0.27 | -175% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.84 | 15.89 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.96 | 75.20 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.38 | 18.53 | 202% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement