Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs NBRRX
JVMCX vs NBRRX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs NBRRX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$28.21
Change+$0.06 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.32B
Neuberger Berman M/C Intrinsic Val R3
Price$27.64
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets52.59M
JVMCX vs NBRRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. NBRRX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a Buy and NBRRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 24.3B vs. NBRRX (52.6M). NBRRX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: NBRRX (0.19) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than NBRRX: JVMCX (14 years) vs NBRRX (15 years). NBRRX (2.06) is less costly to investors than JVMCX (1.86). JVMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. NBRRX (29.00). NBRRX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMCX: NBRRX (0) vs JVMCX (1000). NBRRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.30 vs. JVMCX (2.84). NBRRX return over 5 years is better than : 76.68 vs. JVMCX (49.68).
| JVMCX | NBRRX | JVMCX / NBRRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 1.46 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 2.06 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.502 | 5.295 | 217% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.3B | 52.6M | 46,198% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.19 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.84 | 7.30 | 39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.20 | 14.95 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.68 | 76.68 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.81 | 28.69 | 160% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement