Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs NBREX
JVMCX vs NBREX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs NBREX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$28.06
Change+$0.28 (+1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.25B
Neuberger Berman M/C Intrinsic Val Tr
Price$28.34
Change+$0.33 (+1.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets52.59M
JVMCX vs NBREX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. NBREX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a Hold and NBREX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 24.2B vs. NBREX (52.6M). NBREX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: NBREX (0.35) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than NBREX: JVMCX (14 years) vs NBREX (26 years). JVMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than NBREX (1.73). JVMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. NBREX (29.00). NBREX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMCX: NBREX (0) vs JVMCX (1000). NBREX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.18 vs. JVMCX (-2.54). NBREX return over 5 years is better than : 88.77 vs. JVMCX (54.71).
| JVMCX | NBREX | JVMCX / NBREX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 1.25 | 148% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.73 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.909 | 7.798 | 140% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.2B | 52.6M | 46,008% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.35 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.54 | 4.18 | -61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.96 | 34.27 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.71 | 88.77 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.96 | 42.27 | 121% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers