Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs NBRAX
JVMCX vs NBRAX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs NBRAX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$26.89
Change-$0.78 (-2.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.66B
Neuberger M/C Intrinsic Val A
Price$27.43
Change-$0.98 (-3.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.72M
JVMCX vs NBRAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. NBRAX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a Buy and NBRAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 24.7B vs. NBRAX (50.7M). NBRAX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: NBRAX (0.54) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than NBRAX: JVMCX (14 years) vs NBRAX (16 years). JVMCX (1.86) and NBRAX (1.82) have similar cost to investors . JVMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. NBRAX (16.00). JVMCX (1000) and NBRAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NBRAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.69 vs. JVMCX (3.34). NBRAX return over 5 years is better than : 29.90 vs. JVMCX (15.97).
| JVMCX | NBRAX | JVMCX / NBRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 1.21 | 153% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.82 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.121 | 4.416 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.7B | 50.7M | 48,718% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.54 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.34 | 3.69 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.94 | 9.36 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.97 | 29.90 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.82 | 71.15 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement