Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs NBRAX
JVMCX vs NBRAX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs NBRAX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$27.50
Change+$0.17 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.06B
Neuberger Berman M/C Intrinsic Val A
Price$26.92
Change+$0.16 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets52.08M
JVMCX vs NBRAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. NBRAX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a StrongBuy and NBRAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 23.1B vs. NBRAX (52.1M). NBRAX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: NBRAX (0.38) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than NBRAX: JVMCX (14 years) vs NBRAX (15 years). JVMCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than NBRAX (1.78). JVMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. NBRAX (29.00). JVMCX (1000) and NBRAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NBRAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.51 vs. JVMCX (-0.47). NBRAX return over 5 years is better than : 77.05 vs. JVMCX (50.96).
| JVMCX | NBRAX | JVMCX / NBRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.21 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 1.78 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.696 | 2.396 | 363% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.1B | 52.1M | 44,338% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.38 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.47 | 0.51 | -92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.84 | 16.50 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.96 | 77.05 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.38 | 20.91 | 179% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement