Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs NBRAX
JVMCX vs NBRAX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs NBRAX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$25.82
Change-$0.30 (-1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.46B
Neuberger Berman M/C Intrinsic Val A
Price$24.90
Change-$0.44 (-1.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.31M
JVMCX vs NBRAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. NBRAX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a StrongBuy and NBRAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 21.5B vs. NBRAX (49.3M). NBRAX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: NBRAX (0.40) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than NBRAX: JVMCX (14 years) vs NBRAX (15 years). JVMCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than NBRAX (1.78). JVMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. NBRAX (29.00). JVMCX (1000) and NBRAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.05 vs. NBRAX (-5.37). NBRAX return over 5 years is better than : 63.76 vs. JVMCX (45.41).
| JVMCX | NBRAX | JVMCX / NBRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.21 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 1.78 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.055 | -5.287 | -39% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.5B | 49.3M | 43,611% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.40 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.05 | -5.37 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.31 | 10.51 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.41 | 63.76 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.18 | 6.54 | 385% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers