Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs NBRAX
JVMCX vs NBRAX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs NBRAX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$27.54
Change-$0.37 (-1.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.25B
Neuberger Berman M/C Intrinsic Val A
Price$28.07
Change-$0.46 (-1.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.97M
JVMCX vs NBRAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. NBRAX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a Hold and NBRAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 24.2B vs. NBRAX (51M). NBRAX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: NBRAX (0.35) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than NBRAX: JVMCX (14 years) vs NBRAX (15 years). JVMCX (1.86) and NBRAX (1.78) have similar cost to investors . JVMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. NBRAX (29.00). JVMCX (1000) and NBRAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NBRAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.75 vs. JVMCX (-7.00). NBRAX return over 5 years is better than : 61.66 vs. JVMCX (32.05).
| JVMCX | NBRAX | JVMCX / NBRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 1.21 | 153% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.78 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.316 | 8.520 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.2B | 51M | 47,451% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.35 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.00 | -0.75 | 934% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.88 | 16.85 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.05 | 61.66 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.12 | 38.07 | 108% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement