Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs NBRAX
JVMCX vs NBRAX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs NBRAX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$28.06
Change+$0.28 (+1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.25B
Neuberger Berman M/C Intrinsic Val A
Price$28.34
Change+$0.33 (+1.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets52.59M
JVMCX vs NBRAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. NBRAX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a Hold and NBRAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 24.2B vs. NBRAX (52.6M). NBRAX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: NBRAX (0.36) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than NBRAX: JVMCX (14 years) vs NBRAX (15 years). JVMCX (1.86) and NBRAX (1.78) have similar cost to investors . JVMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. NBRAX (29.00). JVMCX (1000) and NBRAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NBRAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.19 vs. JVMCX (-2.54). NBRAX return over 5 years is better than : 88.85 vs. JVMCX (54.71).
| JVMCX | NBRAX | JVMCX / NBRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 1.21 | 153% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.78 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.909 | 7.798 | 140% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.2B | 52.6M | 46,008% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.36 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.54 | 4.19 | -61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.96 | 34.36 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.71 | 88.85 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.96 | 42.46 | 120% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers