Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs NBRAX
JVMCX vs NBRAX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs NBRAX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$27.55
Change+$0.12 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.85B
Neuberger Berman M/C Intrinsic Val A
Price$27.95
Change+$0.04 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.88M
JVMCX vs NBRAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. NBRAX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a Hold and NBRAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 23.9B vs. NBRAX (50.9M). NBRAX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: NBRAX (0.35) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than NBRAX: JVMCX (14 years) vs NBRAX (15 years). JVMCX (1.86) and NBRAX (1.78) have similar cost to investors . JVMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. NBRAX (29.00). JVMCX (1000) and NBRAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NBRAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.42 vs. JVMCX (-6.45). NBRAX return over 5 years is better than : 73.55 vs. JVMCX (40.87).
| JVMCX | NBRAX | JVMCX / NBRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 1.21 | 153% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.78 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.893 | 6.314 | 141% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.9B | 50.9M | 46,955% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.35 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.45 | -0.42 | 1,536% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.60 | 24.38 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.87 | 73.55 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.46 | 30.18 | 127% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement