Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs NBRAX
JVMCX vs NBRAX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs NBRAX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$26.00
Change+$0.04 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.95B
Neuberger M/C Intrinsic Val A
Price$26.68
Change+$0.04 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.79M
JVMCX vs NBRAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. NBRAX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a Hold and NBRAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 23.9B vs. NBRAX (50.8M). NBRAX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: NBRAX (0.35) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than NBRAX: JVMCX (14 years) vs NBRAX (16 years). JVMCX (1.86) and NBRAX (1.78) have similar cost to investors . JVMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. NBRAX (16.00). JVMCX (1000) and NBRAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.52 vs. NBRAX (-0.30). NBRAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.73 vs. JVMCX (17.72).
| JVMCX | NBRAX | JVMCX / NBRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 1.21 | 153% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.78 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.767 | 1.483 | 187% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.9B | 50.8M | 47,047% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.35 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.52 | -0.30 | -509% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.13 | 14.73 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.72 | 37.73 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.94 | 49.18 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement