Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs NBMRX
JVMCX vs NBMRX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs NBMRX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$27.55
Change+$0.12 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.85B
Neuberger Berman M/C Intrinsic Val R6
Price$27.99
Change+$0.03 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.83M
JVMCX vs NBMRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. NBMRX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a Hold and NBMRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 23.9B vs. NBMRX (50.8M). NBMRX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: NBMRX (0.75) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than NBMRX: JVMCX (14 years) vs NBMRX (7 years). JVMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than NBMRX (1.72). JVMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. NBMRX (29.00). NBMRX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMCX: NBMRX (0) vs JVMCX (1000). NBMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.00 vs. JVMCX (-6.45). NBMRX return over 5 years is better than : 78.46 vs. JVMCX (40.87).
| JVMCX | NBMRX | JVMCX / NBMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 0.75 | 247% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.72 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.893 | 6.669 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.9B | 50.8M | 47,047% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.75 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.45 | -0.00 | 150,286% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.60 | 26.74 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.87 | 78.46 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.46 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement