Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs NBMRX
JVMCX vs NBMRX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs NBMRX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$26.89
Change-$0.78 (-2.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.66B
Neuberger M/C Intrinsic Val R6
Price$27.36
Change-$1.09 (-3.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.72M
JVMCX vs NBMRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. NBMRX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a Buy and NBMRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 24.7B vs. NBMRX (50.7M). NBMRX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: NBMRX (1.04) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than NBMRX: JVMCX (14 years) vs NBMRX (7 years). NBMRX (2.65) is less costly to investors than JVMCX (1.86). JVMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. NBMRX (16.00). NBMRX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMCX: NBMRX (0) vs JVMCX (1000). NBMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.11 vs. JVMCX (3.34). NBMRX return over 5 years is better than : 33.55 vs. JVMCX (15.97).
| JVMCX | NBMRX | JVMCX / NBMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 0.75 | 247% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 2.65 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.121 | 4.467 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.7B | 50.7M | 48,718% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.04 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.34 | 4.11 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.94 | 10.80 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.97 | 33.55 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.82 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers