Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs NBMRX
JVMCX vs NBMRX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs NBMRX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$27.30
Change+$0.17 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.61B
Neuberger Berman M/C Intrinsic Val R6
Price$26.51
Change+$0.19 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets52.37M
JVMCX vs NBMRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. NBMRX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a StrongBuy and NBMRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 22.6B vs. NBMRX (52.4M). NBMRX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: NBMRX (0.82) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than NBMRX: JVMCX (14 years) vs NBMRX (6 years). JVMCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than NBMRX (1.72). JVMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. NBMRX (29.00). NBMRX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMCX: NBMRX (0) vs JVMCX (1000). JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.79 vs. NBMRX (1.39). NBMRX return over 5 years is better than : 82.11 vs. JVMCX (55.49).
| JVMCX | NBMRX | JVMCX / NBMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.75 | 249% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 1.72 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.905 | 1.029 | 768% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.6B | 52.4M | 43,130% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.82 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.79 | 1.39 | 128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.12 | 19.98 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.49 | 82.11 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.64 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement