Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs LYRBX
JVMCX vs LYRBX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs LYRBX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$27.30
Change+$0.17 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.61B
Lyrical US Value Equity Investor
Price$28.87
Change+$0.24 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.1B
JVMCX vs LYRBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. LYRBX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a StrongBuy and LYRBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 22.6B vs. LYRBX (1.1B). JVMCX (0.00) and LYRBX (0.00) have matching dividends . JVMCX was incepted earlier than LYRBX: JVMCX (14 years) vs LYRBX (11 years). JVMCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than LYRBX (1.71). JVMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. LYRBX (13.00). JVMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LYRBX: JVMCX (1000) vs LYRBX (2500). LYRBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.25 vs. JVMCX (1.79). LYRBX return over 5 years is better than : 129.77 vs. JVMCX (55.49).
| JVMCX | LYRBX | JVMCX / LYRBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.24 | 151% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 1.71 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.905 | 12.685 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.6B | 1.1B | 2,062% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.79 | 21.25 | 8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.12 | 58.79 | 34% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.49 | 129.77 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.64 | 82.74 | 43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement