Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs LMCRX
JVMCX vs LMCRX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs LMCRX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$27.55
Change+$0.12 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.74B
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock R3
Price$33.24
Change+$0.14 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.11B
JVMCX vs LMCRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. LMCRX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a Hold and LMCRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 23.7B vs. LMCRX (1.11B). LMCRX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: LMCRX (0.30) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than LMCRX: JVMCX (14 years) vs LMCRX (18 years). JVMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than LMCRX (1.27). LMCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. JVMCX (49.00). LMCRX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMCX: LMCRX (0) vs JVMCX (1000). JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.45 vs. LMCRX (-10.97). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 40.87 vs. LMCRX (35.14).
| JVMCX | LMCRX | JVMCX / LMCRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 1.27 | 146% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.27 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.893 | -0.240 | -3,704% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.7B | 1.11B | 2,143% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.30 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.45 | -10.97 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.60 | 19.49 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.87 | 35.14 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.46 | 36.49 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement