Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs LMCQX
JVMCX vs LMCQX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs LMCQX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$27.30
Change+$0.17 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.61B
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock R2
Price$33.24
Change+$0.22 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.12B
JVMCX vs LMCQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. LMCQX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a StrongBuy and LMCQX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 22.6B vs. LMCQX (1.12B). LMCQX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: LMCQX (0.24) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than LMCQX: JVMCX (14 years) vs LMCQX (17 years). JVMCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than LMCQX (1.38). LMCQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. JVMCX (47.00). LMCQX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMCX: LMCQX (0) vs JVMCX (1000). JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.79 vs. LMCQX (-0.31). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 55.49 vs. LMCQX (43.19).
| JVMCX | LMCQX | JVMCX / LMCQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.38 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 1.38 | 136% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.905 | 0.575 | 1,375% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.6B | 1.12B | 2,027% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.24 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.79 | -0.31 | -586% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.12 | 19.30 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.49 | 43.19 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.64 | 30.99 | 115% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement