Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs LMCQX
JVMCX vs LMCQX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs LMCQX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$27.55
Change+$0.12 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.74B
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock R2
Price$32.93
Change+$0.14 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.11B
JVMCX vs LMCQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. LMCQX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a Hold and LMCQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 23.7B vs. LMCQX (1.11B). LMCQX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: LMCQX (0.23) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than LMCQX: JVMCX (14 years) vs LMCQX (18 years). JVMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than LMCQX (1.37). LMCQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. JVMCX (49.00). LMCQX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMCX: LMCQX (0) vs JVMCX (1000). JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.45 vs. LMCQX (-11.15). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 40.87 vs. LMCQX (34.34).
| JVMCX | LMCQX | JVMCX / LMCQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 1.37 | 135% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.37 | 136% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.893 | -0.363 | -2,449% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.7B | 1.11B | 2,143% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.23 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.45 | -11.15 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.60 | 18.98 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.87 | 34.34 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.46 | 34.84 | 110% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement