Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs LMCPX
JVMCX vs LMCPX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs LMCPX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$28.06
Change+$0.28 (+1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.25B
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock P
Price$32.47
Change+$0.33 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.13B
JVMCX vs LMCPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. LMCPX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a Hold and LMCPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 24.2B vs. LMCPX (1.13B). LMCPX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: LMCPX (0.37) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than LMCPX: JVMCX (14 years) vs LMCPX (28 years). JVMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than LMCPX (1.22). LMCPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. JVMCX (49.00). LMCPX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMCX: LMCPX (0) vs JVMCX (1000). JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.54 vs. LMCPX (-8.51). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 54.71 vs. LMCPX (45.95).
| JVMCX | LMCPX | JVMCX / LMCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 1.22 | 152% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.22 | 152% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.909 | 0.526 | 2,073% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.2B | 1.13B | 2,147% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.37 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.54 | -8.51 | 30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.96 | 27.91 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.71 | 45.95 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.96 | 46.15 | 110% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement